From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED971F8C6 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8AC3999035 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:54:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from esa1.mentor.iphmx.com (esa1.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.129.153]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD6723858415 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:54:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org AD6723858415 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com IronPort-SDR: 1K0n/G0SGGU934R6qxguFg55eZa9V9FKUecR0eJCLTSahm6aZXMNC22lbSGZ+EECBb8Hq0BwGR Z6EYoUszU9THbuqTFh2CvcB95p3UDQ3y8EpVSE8D9cboSOSdCWR+XCuKpnERvu37IpO1ECY9ne oFRxWmOq4/5bGlziU8uB3d/0y+U0vFz8yEm6gYXJqzUTmwM3Mcv57W2HSHZUb0djYAvQHi3/ja j1StKeUaUDHS684POANI95UlZrCeFvvvbQ0jRcxGOROn4hL034VtZ1l9edBXvvlrAcECSjNGx8 y5pXmfwxdkh0C0DC5TnGBpoX X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,296,1620720000"; d="scan'208";a="66808491" Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165]) by esa1.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2021 09:54:27 -0800 IronPort-SDR: HKqDMZpH9geefPqaDjAhpfISQHDPqq2oV4M7MOLKerMQkYQ95SeFOqDKWvGGYoL+Hs8Pw1CJxy bFIvRl2PpZWImXwfHVc0yzjIDeZSRq+pUsnUbTF0PL/AB3kHEXNmjnzeGpI1T8B43KFyLtpCzA eQG+opbH5ct+biH1xYBNfmmJtBQm14HlNP7piPwnotSCFkHOOTqUNOnvJktPLw9bacSn9WSIC0 t6Ct79H1jLzB/nvW8SP+FguIHmCQFZoi2eNxYMPD/Z1Kl+593UGdHXrjNGqXBcJeNZcYJui1gx 3IU= Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:54:20 +0000 From: Joseph Myers X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk To: "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] : An API for tagged address In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20210805131358.300475-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <20210805131358.300475-2-hjl.tools@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-05.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.5) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Florian Weimer , Szabolcs Nagy , GNU C Library , "Kirill A . Shutemov" Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On Thu, 5 Aug 2021, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote: > I can use _Static_assert directly for C. How should I use static_assert > for C++? Probably based on a test of the value of __cplusplus. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com