From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] login: User 64-bit time on struct lastlog
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:31:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2007310028500.4324@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f72fb705-47f4-a1de-5ba7-6631f80c2057@linaro.org>
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
> The different filename sound slike a strategy and I understand that the idea
> would also to use new versions for the utmp/utmpx symbols. What about the
> compatibility symbols, should them be built on top of the new ABI and access
> the newer files or use the old format and access the old filenames?
I suppose that gets into questions about programs explicitly using
utmpname. If a program using the old symbol versions called utmpname
explicitly with some filename, that's probably the name of a file in the
old format. But if it doesn't call utmpname, either you can access the
old files in the old format and not get current data, or the new files in
the new format and convert.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-31 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-29 20:51 [PATCH 1/5] login: Consolidate utmp and utmpx headers Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-07-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] login: Move gnu utmpx to default implementaion Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-10-22 8:15 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-10-22 9:16 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-07-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 3/5] login: Add 64-bit time support Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-07-29 21:17 ` Joseph Myers
2020-07-30 12:34 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-08-02 19:02 ` Maciej W. Rozycki via Libc-alpha
2020-08-02 22:05 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-10-22 9:16 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-07-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] login: User 64-bit time on struct lastlog Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-07-29 21:04 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-07-29 21:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-07-30 12:39 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-07-30 16:19 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2020-07-30 18:54 ` Joseph Myers
2020-07-30 21:53 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-07-31 0:31 ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2020-07-30 21:46 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-10-22 9:25 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-07-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 5/5] Remove __WORDSIZE_TIME64_COMPAT32 Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-10-22 9:31 ` Lukasz Majewski
2020-07-29 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] login: Consolidate utmp and utmpx headers Joseph Myers
2020-07-30 12:36 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2020-10-22 8:06 ` Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2007310028500.4324@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
--to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).