From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6918F1FA04 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74565388B02B; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:34:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from esa2.mentor.iphmx.com (esa2.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.141.98]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AB79388A82C for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:34:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8AB79388A82C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=joseph_myers@mentor.com IronPort-SDR: G1HI6MuXLOM1vNTJIIfNHZUvkZ9tD0aRiBN0fffiU2ssjKBWnpqYlVQL0SQdHUIh/LHVRkWv5w n/nkTcFTnaNy+UxTuOApmEbeWhU44exoZ/j+oo4MMAzNtdi30VUUMZu8R44B9t2MXn9GqdmBju iiZ2fc5oPWYMHlnrDHSncASyBlKLnbskLXaErhVMATFgZILcuSlCPeS8tC9E4Spn1AAg/Hozmj JIXaLJYOdsvMEyMLr7shCm5sTq49tyKa5RUucMAn1rePWCIs+SbsGRZmRsAP4O6pU9jTn4bvXu 6NM= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,468,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="49432056" Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165]) by esa2.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2020 09:34:13 -0800 IronPort-SDR: bbfyIZjMdRxFsYaFNpzkZ0Z+Ua/EEo2bamuiLMCFMNxSbPi9r6RzEcRifS3KfrwUo6a6Dg2KKy N9A1Q09SCdKti1PqUdkyZUwbAQ9kU7tsoP4yWQBgK8LzbIXlb1EPOu+AtVRfgFVSegHfjzh0dL IyQh8i3ZgjyEl86wVcIoaA6QutRiqgvdo5AzArin4cucwgBZE7z91YvPyej3sJ8gcCQQ9qc49a tdSsZBqmILke6Yi02RXIgp7wd8q1pYekO7Ma45M1MkkdHl/anBd8yu91tJeU7+yPgEg5ZKOV98 hu0= Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:34:08 +0000 From: Joseph Myers X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk To: Alistair Francis Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/18] RISC-V: Add the RV32 libm-test-ulps In-Reply-To: <382678c76a8feb7b2cf3bec7db7cf229b520e5d1.1591201405.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com> Message-ID: References: <382678c76a8feb7b2cf3bec7db7cf229b520e5d1.1591201405.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: SVR-IES-MBX-08.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.8) To svr-ies-mbx-02.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.2) X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On Wed, 3 Jun 2020, Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha wrote: > Add a libm-test-ulps for RV32, generated by running `make regen-ulps`. > This is different to the RV64 one. *Why* is it different from the RV64 one? (If some functions produce different results because of use of sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/wordsize-64/ variants on RV64, that would be a good reason, for example, but I don't see ieee754/dbl-64/wordsize-64 mentioned in Implies for RV64.) -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com