From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7465A1F6A9 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=LKuQO tP4qFJAxLZTUpSN7/37QbJVvWz1VmLBarvJr0T0gZn+TO5t8EI/IUiTII+9lIZmj 1Dkv2w99BrCzHiAbqpei8YmlmapbwHY2uZ0NwyfIGroYwvkjBDwr0706XFKuD5dl Ug3xe9sDXrLxn4MUFnGefD20r4OMeEDW7EGl/k= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=HEGk4K0B9IF 0I1qTsWnG9Ke8vjU=; b=Q7e+yLvN6m0jb/qkWF5nguoxU0sQZ7i4LV91EVM4hln 5OL4mdR32hkQFKg7ODASkMqHZy7j2cjUy7vYtE72PBJ6Q/jbzOobsGxTxE1FMDf9 pxSZ+6rGzSObVq/8XCUeSMASj22yMPGeJibrKGvvL9bciaizq4MaPYc+3TX6Qasg = Received: (qmail 127684 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2019 20:58:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 127664 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jan 2019 20:58:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 20:58:24 +0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Carlos O'Donell CC: Rafal Luzynski , Siddhesh Poyarekar , GLIBC Devel Subject: Re: glibc 2.29 - Winter is coming... In-Reply-To: <75bc5d8f-d568-d5e1-aacf-fa19beaac81b@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <833db514-f25e-0c41-bf06-b8cc9272f1c2@gotplt.org> <87r2dv495n.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <1188732039.598484.1546429949188@poczta.nazwa.pl> <0c9a2e87-8b43-725a-d9cc-689ec032ba96@gotplt.org> <2063591203.633198.1546474845289@poczta.nazwa.pl> <75bc5d8f-d568-d5e1-aacf-fa19beaac81b@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" On Thu, 3 Jan 2019, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > The new Era name will likely have to be backported to all the active > open stable branches so they can display the new Era name. Presumably that includes the character properties for U+32FF? (Does anything in glibc care about the to-be-announced compatibility decomposition that's the reason Unicode 12.1 will be needed or is glibc only concerned with character properties that are already known?) -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com