From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.30 - 6 days until ABI freeze.
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:53:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3169040-82d3-f38f-0c0e-a60ea8b59958@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKCAbMjhaE7OzYxyXH_AqH9Gz8a-uF0fcNZVhT5q-R0umSBD1w@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/27/19 12:27 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:45 PM Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you have posted a patch that changes or adds a new
>> ABI *cough* RISC-V 32-bit *cough* then please consider
>> adding yourself to the "Rlease blockers?" list on the
>> release page:
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.30#Release_blockers.3F
>>
>> Anyone else with changes should do so also.
>
> Can I get a quick opinion from you as to whether my "public header
> file hygiene improvements" patchset
> (https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-06/msg00773.html) is 2.30
> material at this point or whether it should wait for 2.31?
My quick opinion is that this is going to break a bunch of stuff and
that's OK, we'll fix the fallout.
However, that to me means that we should commit it when 2.31 opens,
and *right away* to get 6 months of downstream tumbleweed/rawhide
testing with the changes.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 1:45 glibc 2.30 - 6 days until ABI freeze Carlos O'Donell
2019-06-25 17:54 ` Alistair Francis
2019-06-25 18:05 ` Zack Weinberg
2019-06-25 20:36 ` Alistair Francis
2019-06-25 23:55 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-06-25 18:06 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-06-25 20:57 ` Jim Wilson
2019-06-25 23:59 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-06-26 17:52 ` Shawn Landden
2019-06-26 21:13 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-06-27 12:33 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2019-06-27 16:27 ` Zack Weinberg
2019-06-27 16:53 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2019-06-28 8:22 ` Dragan Mladjenovic
2019-06-28 11:22 ` Mike Crowe
2019-06-28 11:58 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-06-28 12:10 ` Mike Crowe
2019-06-28 12:55 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-07-04 13:39 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2019-07-04 14:30 ` Mike Crowe
2019-07-04 14:39 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2019-07-04 14:41 ` Florian Weimer
2019-07-05 15:38 ` Mike Crowe
2019-07-09 18:04 ` Mike Crowe
2019-07-10 20:22 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2019-07-12 3:41 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-07-12 20:30 ` Adhemerval Zanella
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-27 7:20 Mihailo Stojanović
2019-06-27 16:17 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3169040-82d3-f38f-0c0e-a60ea8b59958@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=zackw@panix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).