unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John McCall via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: ia32-abi@googlegroups.com
Cc: "Wang, Pengfei" <pengfei.wang@intel.com>,
	LLVM Dev <llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [PATCH] Add optional _Float16 support
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 01:55:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOq2Nw=GKywwNS8vLYt09x4E5Ls1hwa-jBCaawVx38i=hLeC8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOrJhGd223LTKTEh-OeWbpR3+p7cs2x_B3qWz+usrZJnxg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 9:40 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:24 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 8:41 AM Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 8:59 PM Wang, Pengfei <
> pengfei.wang@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Return _Float16 and _Complex _Float16 values in %xmm0/%xmm1
> registers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please explain the behavior here? Is there difference
> between _Float16 and _Complex _Float16 when return? I.e.,
> > > > > 1, In which case will _Float16 values return in both %xmm0 and
> %xmm1?
> > > > > 2, For a single _Float16 value, are both real part and imaginary
> part returned in %xmm0? Or returned in %xmm0 and %xmm1 respectively?
> > > >
> > > > Here is the v2 patch to add the missing _Float16 bits.   The PDF
> file is at
> > > >
> > > > https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/i386-ABI/-/wikis/Intel386-psABI
> > >
> > > This PDF shows _Complex _Float16 as having a size of 2 bytes (should be
> > > 4-byte size, 2-byte alignment).
> > >
> > > It also seems to change double from 4-byte to 8-byte alignment, which
> is
> > > wrong.  And it's inconsistent about whether it covers the long double =
> > > double (Android) case - it shows that case for _Complex long double but
> > > not for long double itself.
> >
> > Here is the v3 patch with the fixes.  I also updated the PDF file.
>
> Here is the final patch I checked in.   _Complex _Float16 is changed to
> return
> in XMM0 register.   The new PDF file is at
>
> https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/i386-ABI/-/wikis/Intel386-psABI


This should be explicit that the real part is returned in bits 0..15 and
the imaginary part is returned in bits 16..31, or however we conventionally
designate subcomponents of a vector.

John.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-24  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-01 21:05 [PATCH] Add optional _Float16 support H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-01 22:10 ` Joseph Myers
2021-07-01 22:27   ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-01 22:40     ` Joseph Myers
2021-07-01 23:01       ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-01 23:05         ` [llvm-dev] " Craig Topper via Libc-alpha
2021-07-01 23:33     ` Jacob Lifshay via Libc-alpha
2021-07-02  7:45       ` Richard Biener via Libc-alpha
2021-07-02  8:03         ` Hongtao Liu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-02  9:21         ` Jakub Jelinek via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13  3:59     ` Wang, Pengfei via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13 14:26       ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13 14:48         ` Wang, Pengfei via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13 15:04           ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-13 15:41         ` Joseph Myers
2021-07-13 16:24           ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-07-29 13:39             ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-08-24  5:55               ` John McCall via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-08-25 12:35                 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-08-25 20:32                   ` John McCall via Libc-alpha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOq2Nw=GKywwNS8vLYt09x4E5Ls1hwa-jBCaawVx38i=hLeC8Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ia32-abi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=llvm-dev@lists.llvm.org \
    --cc=pengfei.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=rjmccall@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).