From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS17314 8.43.84.0/22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEEFB1F910 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.b="nBTISfgm"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB673852208 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:28:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AAB673852208 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1668806911; bh=5DcW51WsjCDWggOtvfsnBkQHtWu0SQrHEVt9dvY1yTY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=nBTISfgm9nLs5aOFasjBwJbIM7Hq5fgbSXJc8Xo5MA0kv9fnznJrBYXSguAFqz4Mf kDXIfsv8z5ohwjfaAQozGWqApNQhzDptpev8zumzSt1bWkd9IXPYjtBl7Vr9IST7q3 sVWcIKVSOYVQfJaBPnwolCQZ/KQu2aEJeEJVGhB4= Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D3083853D40 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 21:28:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2D3083853D40 Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id g51-20020a9d12b6000000b0066dbea0d203so3848446otg.6 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:28:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=5DcW51WsjCDWggOtvfsnBkQHtWu0SQrHEVt9dvY1yTY=; b=eS99XMCtMKAUL02jURExaqCD2vx47JogdFpMKw31wByCwryk4qtz2zmKG/iSCXsMLJ zeywn8qExWYOEp6y3J5U49E56ybajKnMyhVipgJyfHPT+hIa8gUHi57U9p7RybylCz9q ZG8NN0CCxjeKFyBbiht6xqBhGEp70uJVRUNfNKFhqanTSXZNPSzVvxkwTWMHkDcoQ8Zf zxP6FHXstV6XVSG6ikYl/x31hNQiQaPPQTA7gfNDAHay9oId+MzWceXGNVGy3VkspV3Y fGovufRs2S5Q0Cst8AiPpRyqLy0EP5BmQPqYQ8gGZvmMjYrDavC1uLRzr1NFnjlCOecJ hyOg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkGINWIrGH8/8sjYWoKZ2NgDRags0UjL/rI4NaC1OzRfY/bXk0E vii/2Mz6hKC96KVs3YrnQB2arhd4P3e61zdAAEBnFknX X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4kAYeBx2OwycqGunMUdvC3dynY1HOVlaLWxa8VoSwAgYTKDC6Lw2C94OTkLo5GBToWxABOfX/dQ/WIQCqpRGw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:201a:b0:66c:49e4:82f8 with SMTP id e26-20020a056830201a00b0066c49e482f8mr4744486otp.371.1668806891423; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:28:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221118190835.1033248-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> <20221118212255.1305681-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> <20221118212255.1305681-3-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20221118212255.1305681-3-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:27:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/fpu: Factor out shared avx2/avx512 code in svml_{s|d}_wrapper_impl.h To: Noah Goldstein Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, andrey.kolesov@intel.com, carlos@systemhalted.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" Reply-To: "H.J. Lu" Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:23 PM Noah Goldstein wrote: > > Code is exactly the same for the two so better to only maintain one > version. > > All math and mathvec tests pass on x86. Is the output of "objdump -dw" on libmvec.so the same before and after the patch? -- H.J.