unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] nptl: Update struct pthread_unwind_buf
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 19:55:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpcDM0hp_h1EomZrjaR2raSiS5kB-B0o6fFRBZ9ysA=Ew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87po4t9mxt.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:13 AM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> * H. J. Lu:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
>>> * H. J. Lu:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:31 AM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
>>>>> * H. J. Lu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> libpthread cancellation implementation passes cancel_jmp_buf to
>>>>>> libgcc unwinder,
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh.  Where does it do that?  If you mean _Unwind_ForcedUnwind, I think
>>>>> that's just an opaque closure argument for the callback.
>>>>
>>>> Yes.  Libgcc unwinder needs to deal with it.
>>>
>>> Please point me to the code.  Thanks.
>>
>> sysdeps/nptl/unwind-forcedunwind.c has
>>
>> _Unwind_Reason_Code
>> _Unwind_ForcedUnwind (struct _Unwind_Exception *exc, _Unwind_Stop_Fn stop,
>>       void *stop_argument)
>> {
>>   if (__glibc_unlikely (libgcc_s_handle == NULL))
>>     pthread_cancel_init ();
>>   else
>>     atomic_read_barrier ();
>>
>>   _Unwind_Reason_Code (*forcedunwind)
>>     (struct _Unwind_Exception *, _Unwind_Stop_Fn, void *)
>>     = libgcc_s_forcedunwind;
>>   PTR_DEMANGLE (forcedunwind);
>>   return forcedunwind (exc, stop, stop_argument);
>> }
>
> Thanks.  I think stop_argument ends up in the private_2 member inside
> unwind.inc, which is only passed back to the callback (the stop
> function pointer) in _Unwind_ForcedUnwind_Phase2, and not interpreted
> by libgcc itself.  So this shouldn't be a problem.

Please take a look at hjl/setjmp/cancel branch:

https://github.com/hjl-tools/glibc/tree/hjl/setjmp/cancel

Functions, like LIBC_START_MAIN, START_THREAD_DEFN as well as these
with thread cancellation, call setjmp, but never return to their
callers after longjmp returns.  This patch adds <bits/setjmp-cancel.h>
and <setjmp-cancelP.h> to provide a version of setjmp family functions,
__setjmp_cancel and __sigsetjmp_cancel, which are used to implement
thread cancellation.  The default __setjmp_cancel and __sigsetjmp_cancel
are defined as setjmp and __sigsetjmp, respectively, which are the same
as before.

On x86, a different version is added to avoid saving and restoring
shadow stack register.  __libc_longjmp, which is a private interface
for cancellation implementation in libpthread, is changed to call
__longjmp_cancel instead of __longjmp.

This leaves cancel_jmp_buf unchanged.  But is it worth it?

1. I have to add  __setjmp_cancel and __sigsetjmp_cancel which won't
save and restore shadow stack register.
2. I still need yet to add the new version of __sigsetjmp for older binaries.
3, Older .o files compiled against glibc 2.27 are still incompatible with
glibc 2.28.

-- 
H.J.


  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-01 20:57 [PATCH 0/2] nptl: Update struct pthread_unwind_buf H.J. Lu
2018-02-01 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "Revert Intel CET changes to __jmp_buf_tag (Bug 22743)" H.J. Lu
2018-02-01 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] nptl: Update struct pthread_unwind_buf [BZ #22743] H.J. Lu
2018-02-08  9:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] nptl: Update struct pthread_unwind_buf Carlos O'Donell
2018-02-08 11:55   ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-09  6:29     ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-02-09 10:48       ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-09 11:13         ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-09 12:11           ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-09 12:34             ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-09 14:13               ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-09 14:33                 ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-09 15:24                   ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-24  5:46               ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-02-24 15:19                 ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-24 15:46                   ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-25  2:04                     ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-25  9:26                       ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-25 11:37                         ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-25 11:59                           ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-25 12:53                             ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-25 12:55                               ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-25 12:58                                 ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-25 13:23                                   ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-25 13:31                                     ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-25 13:36                                       ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-25 13:49                                         ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-25 13:49                                         ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-25 14:00                                           ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-25 14:13                                             ` Florian Weimer
2018-02-26  3:55                                               ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2018-02-28 23:23                                                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-03-07 11:56                                                   ` H.J. Lu
2018-03-07 17:34                                                     ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-03-07 19:47                                                       ` H.J. Lu
2018-03-07 20:14                                                         ` H.J. Lu
2018-03-07 22:06                                                           ` H.J. Lu
2018-03-08 12:24                                                             ` Tsimbalist, Igor V
2018-03-08 12:48                                                               ` H.J. Lu
2018-03-09  0:47                                                                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-03-09  5:23                                                                   ` H.J. Lu
2018-03-15  4:20                                                                     ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-02-24  6:41         ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-02-08 13:27   ` H.J. Lu
2018-02-09  6:40     ` Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMe9rOpcDM0hp_h1EomZrjaR2raSiS5kB-B0o6fFRBZ9ysA=Ew@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).