From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 327FD1F5AE for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADAE39578EC; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:29:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AADAE39578EC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1620134957; bh=sKGRPyjqgt9eRPPKKBjwSkV6L2S/LTG6cuM15Bn705o=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=xX1k48fQL0SEaWpPiPDp3dvxccSD6dqvqxpHggOc//kvFVyWmpsVK4f9NktlDL1sa p4p24vFRCk/cUYozVwCn8/bMeXqXjy9ThwUwp3fYnwOBueGfvJjY7+GlmKZDOg0ymu EFpOacsT76kYU7hgzPDFavudQnoGuvMsE75fa1HM= Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A06D53950C61 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:29:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A06D53950C61 Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id u25-20020a0568302319b02902ac3d54c25eso863832ote.1 for ; Tue, 04 May 2021 06:29:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sKGRPyjqgt9eRPPKKBjwSkV6L2S/LTG6cuM15Bn705o=; b=tYeJUoz6MVPRDpGzXZNi+4NxennriR+COtNdS5zw6Nyf6H4eIUlru0Lq7yfraWvquV 6CxxMyP5NUhcvJd+mEESKtk2abMwSnHyDCK2gOgt4JsmCasnArTer4RPhC9ta4XJgY+P p9lm1B42W1w3jrXBbdE2SadUP4rDinwrntPhnjHDl72WEh2CY3s+yOqA9FhilDj9zf6t mwYW4dCpg1/aIPd0XnXXL2/KF9zFKDC0bVng24qxN3qvw/tjC1lSHtZQyDVWFOYXiYI7 zRcY7YJP271ffVoeNEjEpe2dP9ldXVSmFWNyIWJ3ozKp02TgR4VwMA9xq9YkCvO979wA NgUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pyABykVKKF7GrSY+84Z6677tumqnM8CsEMJwdHZjmg0DXa80V 6CgS3GZhP/QANDQEuK/mZ/v0Z5DVma9TgbIDjLo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZQAn+Aiks7+sTigePrb/HBg++HPHX015ctTxcFIWA0g+xEv/bNqEh91ktU4aF2KHecYIZVky07PGjQEIhKQY= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:67cf:: with SMTP id c15mr11613756otn.285.1620134950088; Tue, 04 May 2021 06:29:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87h7jqguew.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87k0oeln6s.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87wnsek7ku.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87sg32k79x.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87lf8uk6u2.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87fsz2k5fm.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87fsz2k5fm.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 06:28:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] elf: Implement filtering of symbols historically defined in libpthread To: Florian Weimer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" Reply-To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Andreas Schwab , GNU C Library Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 6:13 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * H. J. Lu: > > > Why re-linking is needed for the binary executable test? > > I don't want us to bundle the sources of an old glibc version, just to > comply with the LGPL requirements for one single test (or talk to legal > folks to figure out if this is required). We can include both the source and the binary. We just use the pre-built binary built against the older glibc. I don't see an issue here. -- H.J.