From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0D41F461 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:39:38 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Sogs +/X6Td+RATZugRHFqzKjgnOlEhsWcTiIqvrOJkY9oI45nbheqEWe/D08UqFVR5+0 tiIT2H0J8oDfW8zSCDWBIROpTIAIc/1o60vIvCWpHWEth9RbsrMrUQwom0o9wUKs CNxSA3wvGAAJOv2ohEGhqmcFpUS3mAbRAZfEJcc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; s=default; bh=uE38lmrqmJ PpMzraAZtv+Ef+NIU=; b=HC5Kn311SpsxY/ZjsVuDSYqGctplOFAJvdTS3Kg2tk m3m6G/copbJqUSGuVd2nuMDLU6YfT5OAJAjKiKK2U/SigTUoZGtMVk+5QVZg37FB fSfyPuzCHMW0gVXhDQYxkJY3NXMQyjvOVLduE8VoOTAv3oxBisk2qJ9yV1BJRKSX M= Received: (qmail 69717 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2019 13:39:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 69704 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jun 2019 13:39:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mail-qt1-f193.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2df9d3878359585ac1cc46243fb6664f7a50b3b3.1561421042.git.alistair.francis@wdc.com> <87ftnx6i0m.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <877e9950hj.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 15:39:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC v2 08/20] sysdeps/wait: Use waitid if avaliable To: Florian Weimer Cc: Zack Weinberg , Alistair Francis , GNU C Library Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:29 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:10 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > Does this means that RV32 will use a 32-bit struct timeval in those > > system calls? Even if everything else 64-bit? > > Correct. Only those four (all deprecated but still used) system calls, > as we could not agree on a new interface before 5.1, and there > is no urgency for deployment when they can be emulated. Correction: getrusage() is still a recommended interface in POSIX.1-2017 with no nanosecond based replacement, while wait4(), getitimer() and getrusage() are all obsolete but cannot be implemented on top of other POSIX system calls. Arnd