From: Douglas Jacobsen <dmjacobsen@lbl.gov>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: glibc 2.26 deadlock with __resolv_conf_detach
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:40:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHaWJFH96O65101OssWBMOysPGOaOnCdebNs0g06_TE0O8UOvQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mvmftksof9v.fsf@suse.de>
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:34 AM Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Sep 19 2019, Douglas Jacobsen <dmjacobsen@lbl.gov> wrote:
>
> > The scenario we've uncovered is that some vendor software runs a
> > multithreaded daemon, which then fork()s, and spawns a thread,
>
> In the forked child? If a multi-threaded process calls fork, the child
> may only call async-signal-safe functions.
>
Yes, the forked child is generating and joining a thread prior to
execve(), and then the child deadlocks. This code was not generating
problems in SLES12sp3 so it has the appearance of a new problem, but I
do understand what you're saying about async-signal-safe here. Would
the mechanism of failure here be that the lock variable in
glibc/resolv/resolv_conf.c is already locked in the parent process at
the time of fork() - or whenever the lookup is initially done from the
parent memory?
Thanks,
Doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-19 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-19 7:55 glibc 2.26 deadlock with __resolv_conf_detach Douglas Jacobsen
2019-09-19 8:34 ` Andreas Schwab
2019-09-19 12:40 ` Douglas Jacobsen [this message]
2019-09-19 13:02 ` Andreas Schwab
2019-09-19 14:27 ` Douglas Jacobsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHaWJFH96O65101OssWBMOysPGOaOnCdebNs0g06_TE0O8UOvQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dmjacobsen@lbl.gov \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).