From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C6B4211B4 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:29:50 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=kIIn 6A5FDeZfBC9antYUs+RqfE/n+fqqQRDnvJ9M3HAjs58SwvAtg/tnSKzgQTOAoU4N dpdl0290BbIRMtFK1SfZ3rAieYyDqWAs+imft6EbNFSI+R5MsO2qU187wZNiGZdH bQzlqu76Ma6rhQPuIgLwqpcOsLi3P4GWDC31Hco= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; s=default; bh=L8c4HgGNXm sasF/6d4mAXnK79bY=; b=Io/zl9rI6GJEruCmcLYHWnsqPRlX9KhvCk3i0wSTMo h5eNgK55Ww65QYXkMEtzzL230csf8A/lRM2nqs+49EUgCixR5+NVA0gqfBpZcQsF aw0wS3n5OBEP618HN9cWwL9ob7GrTMJDwBq3zEDplMEFTu16eBzs+Fwzm76886M9 w= Received: (qmail 120067 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2019 17:29:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 120052 invoked by uid 89); 14 Jan 2019 17:29:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mail-vs1-f65.google.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=toTotcIrzFREgwrsYqIMF8z67d2kA1R59h5jnXLnzmQ=; b=f51bEdjvp6u1P4MKjdd82Tj+PWRFzBT5ONB3XQSg6uA/kXup2u68ThZBdXhsb3vf8u C/lryJdEIXSePnfbt4Uccexxo8kjfdc9Q6IblYZzbzcbMJYTn+Z7mw+6NCmNqFRE+M/S KfvytkquqCI9OZEeSIjMPDrbKupS3d5FzevR64GJze7O9odIjbyoek2hOYuqclQp5ymo zPamfgl2a+d70D9sJ5Aj/QlUntC1GeMcJ9PhADoM8JmjqIvur9TiNDdM9/uOsGpGGljy 74Xi50Qq8EpjuMsKKWPjgI1rygR5ff1rSO+iHwXyzpJ2Z5SSFul3+FZW8A3MODKE7U1r u+6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190113234809.4818-1-jimw@sifive.com> <87tvibbbqw.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87tvibbbqw.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> From: Jim Wilson Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 09:29:33 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix elfutils testsuite unwind failures. To: Florian Weimer Cc: GNU C Library Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 5:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > Do you expect func to be inlined, to preserve the pattern of the > original test? It shouldn't be necessary for func to be inlined to preserve the intent of the original test. We are just unwinding to reach the end of the stack, and if func isn't inlined it is just one more function to unwind through. Jim