From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF0C61F5AE for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:47:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB74A398B411; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:47:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CB74A398B411 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1619524030; bh=64kmxFaZRJgeh0rsva6EL8c4e3/h+5/T03YImPv9NFw=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=bf2jqa7GMtZp/Uvj8eQFfOSPIrMC/nCqQnS2krcr3x2XpyfesVU6AEuJsXhnfpKrJ 2/LwqZXx83NbH0t7Sdw28Mes9iJGQNlMNC3r725BfZkJcZwONxk79tu0uXeFo4aJcp NesKeSDu6JJ0Ulb4MU0o0urPSeiHRQTQvepwv73I= Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com (mail-ua1-x931.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BA353833026; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 11:47:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 9BA353833026 Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id i5so1926668uap.5; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 04:47:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=64kmxFaZRJgeh0rsva6EL8c4e3/h+5/T03YImPv9NFw=; b=JGuV5suszOgxn5LQRk2ilimY9ZlQBncBPQaZ7ZSMGFhi+PyDEcNMFgMe+PDaguZrN7 5hlsh+piMBgF6BH3hbMmz99KE1WIFCD3xHk+BesiKsNPy6ETW9Gr4qmXczaoxaiW/RLS B3txvVbLHgFjpGwFog+nYcz5aqt719RH+Z9+bGR3prftFoBMIVP3+PusOy+jdqeNoPK1 TtRJ1mPD21HJKFcpfbEX+5euhYdqv9X6uKMoh/wv+7w1GcHcMG3d7GE8bgYdb3eaqUUD V/W55b+KRRPt3haq45o5c8zAfsjc40R9AmSr7jLnUc1gxfYu+jPAnvvcjTR+eNI6a2cB oZOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530sgzvCoxtpWz4OFcrmwy0g+NzUO2lDjhYhS/dqp/xjUU3emO7s 69wGdAi+xo123dIMLg5YYICPUgtX3zeQQysb224= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFXVRY+oIB1CMaeeHUFClJc2w0oKJbjE9BGZliLwri1Cr9gW+edBnesQI+T8kIflWJex0EGyZYtRDOUEt881o= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:12a:: with SMTP id 39mr16405206uak.19.1619524027276; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 04:47:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87czuum5yb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87pmyq4k4k.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87pmyq4k4k.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:46:56 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nptl_db: Support different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744) To: Florian Weimer Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Emil Velikov via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Emil Velikov Cc: Pedro Alves , Emil Velikov via Libc-alpha , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Kevin Buettner Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" Hi Florian, On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 11:57, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Are there any plans for glibc 2.33.1 or shall I ask the Arch Linux > > maintainers to include this in the package? > > I'm going to backport it to the release branch, but we probably won't > make an actual 2.33.1 release from it. So it depends on what Arch Linux > does with the release branch. > I can see the patch landed in master \o/ but it's missing in the 2.33 branch. Did it slip through the cracks or you're simply EBUSY with the nptl/c11 pthread to libc transition? Thanks Emil