From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066081F601 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.b="UNdeS224"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE312388FB41 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:28:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE312388FB41 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1670444890; bh=UD/anZLfiOv9RJ0tWXJfykLV5clwlQ78JcNu0MZ9Qj8=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=UNdeS224I1JJZC0j23jk6TBoXnKzZBvDrZoxk98uygOlZLflKqW9EIg054F1v2q4z tBnvlTV/RPV0C50OYi6ty8GoYi99sFvopjK0AXuSe5NSA8hOKzq4vX+PzM5pBSqx6W 9eEhbBirdTXkCTJNdk+SqOGiG1/46XZrFml9p/1M= Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8103834C34 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:27:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6F8103834C34 Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id v3so17396569pgh.4 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 12:27:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=UD/anZLfiOv9RJ0tWXJfykLV5clwlQ78JcNu0MZ9Qj8=; b=yzZ90R3u/lOa8zTt+kxVHiB26y0H8R7QLpTyebH08Z4NlVifuoZ8g8LyN2ot3ci0p+ M52hwijuC+Gux6A/FOfELdeTD5yTWRAIkwY69PWySesej63kbI+5QNB2U9MA5J2G2YEY 2OHlKBgSDbPIkSGoYUKsV+ny9iLxfFJdYE+6Oaov8myIhBGauh2h9m+yZLZSvgeulLGb NmuTgua/AnN9pttVGiDIdjUuQjkPVgXEKmzOwIsMHWsyxYoqlJ76X+ng9YgcySUQHMQV BqmPZeo02sGNMs6XCHXvDECW8hAcX0GWmdv0Qy/vA1JK7Yq6UWf5iByuZSDER1DtTzTO ECTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pl1I6lG/KCRVQ8DLIyOMzSOYPRA8H+V1VY4B05R2fp+l7YMRIyo U8sisUkbAC9EHDjfTa9wTRw6BxMNrLaOB9oIbZQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5GAeO1PGzB3+bp8vJ0sbkiqJqzSJvhk5ki1WZHteKu5ZAMlBAgzW5HHD5MDxlDgWmGnFUPexuoobrxFt7S0Go= X-Received: by 2002:a63:fc0a:0:b0:434:7885:6ade with SMTP id j10-20020a63fc0a000000b0043478856ademr70362202pgi.243.1670444869478; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 12:27:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7d9272e3-5c11-93fc-ee81-6ad4ca631c97@redhat.com> <0951dc64-7c93-805f-80dc-dcb163bbf4b5@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <0951dc64-7c93-805f-80dc-dcb163bbf4b5@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 12:27:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: glibc: Testing LF BBB instance for patch review meetings. To: "Carlos O'Donell" Cc: libc-alpha , Adhemerval Zanella , Florian Weimer , Siddhesh Poyarekar , Arjun Shankar , Patrick McGehearty , "H.J. Lu" , Szabolcs Nagy , Noah Goldstein Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andrew Pinski via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Andrew Pinski Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:20 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > On 12/6/22 13:07, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 10:00 AM Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha > > wrote: > >> > >> Community, > >> > >> Thanks to Linux Foundation IT team and GTI (Toolchain Infrastructure for > >> the GNU Toolchain) we have started testing the LF BBB instance as a part > >> of our FOSS solutions that support glibc and the other GNU Toolchain > >> components. > > > > Why are these emails about infrastructure seeming so far inbetween and > > then blam there is something new? > > Please follow the GTI TAC discussions in the open here: > https://lore.kernel.org/gti-tac/ This is the first time this has been published to any of the GTI mailing lists. Unlike the sourceware related things which have pushed out emails and archives to folks. This is a bad look for the GTI folks really. > > The LF IT team setup a BBB instance for their own use and offered it to us to use too: > https://lore.kernel.org/gti-tac/7827d4e3-5bad-0436-07ac-058782b01d25@gotplt.org/T/#t > > We want FOSS solution to host GTI TAC meetings (even before we can decide what to do > with the GNU Toolchain infrastructure) to support collaboration and attendance. > > > Seems like there is a lot of stuff being done in closed doors without > > any real feedback except for the select few. > > That the LF IT setup a BBB server for general use is great news. Why not stay with sourceware? I still have not seen any reason to move away from sourceware except the Linux foundation is there. Thanks, Andrew > > The subject is about testing this solution for the community. Join in? Please feel > free to attend the meeting. See if the solution works. > > Please give the GTI TAC feedback. > > > That is so wrong for open source communities. > > If the glibc community finds the LF BBB instance useful then I'm going to write a > proposal to the GTI TAC that we support this for glibc patch review meetings. > > The only way we're going to know if its useful is if we test it out :-) > > -- > Cheers, > Carlos. >