From: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] fix ifunc with static pie [BZ #27072]
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:37:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f68b24a-437c-db8e-d1fa-b26d2e06d103@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1610986541.git.szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
As a side note I tried your branch with a build for all support Linux
ABIs and it as least improves by issuing an error on architectures
where previously indicated support static-pie but it is broken in practice
(powerpc for instance [1])
So currently static-pie are support for all architectures, however it
fails to build for:
alpha-linux-gnu
arc-linux-gnuhf
hppa-linux-gnu
ia64-linux-gnu
m68k-linux-gnu
microblaze-linux-gnu
riscv32-linux-gnu-rv32imafdc-ilp32d
riscv64-linux-gnu-rv64imafdc-lp64d
s390-linux-gnu
sparc64-linux-gnu
sparcv9-linux-gnu
By requiring PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN hppa, m68, microblaze, mips, nios2,
and powerpc fail at configure. Some architecture still fails at build:
alpha-linux-gnu
arc-linux-gnuhf
riscv32-linux-gnu-rv32imafdc-ilp32d
riscv64-linux-gnu-rv64imafdc-lp64d
s390-linux-gnu
sparc64-linux-gnu
sparcv9-linux-gnu
I haven't checked if mips is currently broken for static-pie (since
as for powerpc, it does not define PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN); but I would
expect so.
It would be good if we could avoid building the broken configuration
and warn it on configure, but I don't think this should be a blocker.
The NEWS for 2.27 states this features is only supported for x86
and aarch64, so I wonder if would be better to just enable it for
the supported architectures instead of relying on PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN.
I will finish review the patchset tomorrow.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/719444
On 18/01/2021 13:22, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote:
> v4:
> - added patches from H.J.Lu:
> - x86: fix libmvec tests
> - x86: fix syscalls in libc_enable_secure
> - x86: avoid relative reloc for _dl_sysinfo
> - x86: add ifunc test
> - i386 cannot mark all symbols hidden, so use fine grain
> marking in files that participate in early code before
> static pie self relocation.
> - the patch that makes all libc symbols hidden is still
> included: it is now only an optimization for non-i386
> targets.
>
> v3:
> - refactor tunables: move internals out of dl-tunables.h
> - use generated max string length in the tunables list
> instead of magic values.
>
> v2:
> - check PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN for --enable-static-pie
> - change string buffer sizes in the tunables
> - fix env_alias == NULL logic in __tunables_init
> - move __ehdr_start processing after self relocation
>
>
> force pushed into nsz/bug27072 branch.
>
> Issues that are not addressed:
> - tunables try to allocate memory even with non-suid exe.
> allocation is only needed for rewriting the GLIBC_TUNABLES
> env var. (i think a case can be made that if anything there
> is TUNABLE_SECLEVEL_SXID_ERASE then this env var would be
> simply dropped, that would simplify this significantly).
> - __sbrk only needs the hidden visibility magic because of
> tunables, ideally we would not do allocations before self
> relocation.
> - tunable list data structure is not optimized for compactness.
> - all symbols are forced hidden in libc.a, but i think lib*.a
> should do the same. (other than lib*_nonshared.a)
> - i386 introduced a fair bit of complications: may be avoiding
> relative relocs is too much to ask for and relocations should
> be done in two steps after all: relative first, then irelative
> when tunable etc are set up.
>
> H.J. Lu (4):
> libmvec: Add extra-test-objs to test-extras
> elf: Avoid RELATIVE relocation for _dl_sysinfo
> Use <startup.h> in __libc_init_secure
> x86: Check ifunc resolver with CPU_FEATURE_USABLE [BZ #27072]
>
> Szabolcs Nagy (6):
> configure: Require PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN for static pie
> elf: Make the tunable struct definition internal only
> elf: Avoid RELATIVE relocs in __tunables_init
> Use hidden visibility for early static PIE code
> csu: Move static pie self relocation later [BZ #27072]
> Make libc symbols hidden in static PIE
>
> configure | 14 +++
> configure.ac | 5 +
> csu/libc-start.c | 48 +++++---
> elf/dl-reloc-static-pie.c | 2 +
> elf/dl-support.c | 18 ++-
> elf/dl-tunable-types.h | 42 +++++--
> elf/dl-tunables.c | 6 +-
> elf/dl-tunables.h | 35 ++----
> elf/enbl-secure.c | 10 +-
> include/libc-symbols.h | 9 +-
> misc/sbrk.c | 4 +
> scripts/gen-tunables.awk | 16 ++-
> sysdeps/generic/startup.h | 26 ++++
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/libc-start.c | 5 +
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/startup.h | 29 ++++-
> sysdeps/x86/Makefile | 14 +++
> sysdeps/x86/libc-start.c | 5 +
> sysdeps/x86/tst-ifunc-isa-1-static.c | 1 +
> sysdeps/x86/tst-ifunc-isa-1.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++
> sysdeps/x86/tst-ifunc-isa-2-static.c | 1 +
> sysdeps/x86/tst-ifunc-isa-2.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++
> sysdeps/x86_64/fpu/Makefile | 8 ++
> 22 files changed, 465 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 sysdeps/x86/tst-ifunc-isa-1-static.c
> create mode 100644 sysdeps/x86/tst-ifunc-isa-1.c
> create mode 100644 sysdeps/x86/tst-ifunc-isa-2-static.c
> create mode 100644 sysdeps/x86/tst-ifunc-isa-2.c
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-18 16:22 [PATCH v4 00/10] fix ifunc with static pie [BZ #27072] Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] configure: Require PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN for static pie Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] libmvec: Add extra-test-objs to test-extras Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 20:04 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] elf: Make the tunable struct definition internal only Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] elf: Avoid RELATIVE relocs in __tunables_init Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] Use hidden visibility for early static PIE code Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 21:49 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:24 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] elf: Avoid RELATIVE relocation for _dl_sysinfo Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 13:51 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:25 ` V2 " H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:35 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] Use <startup.h> in __libc_init_secure Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 13:56 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] csu: Move static pie self relocation later [BZ #27072] Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:07 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:35 ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:36 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:48 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 15:24 ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 15:32 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 16:47 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:03 ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:10 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:25 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:33 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:38 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:38 ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:42 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:47 ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:53 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 17:59 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:25 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] x86: Check ifunc resolver with CPU_FEATURE_USABLE " Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:11 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 14:37 ` V2 " H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-21 16:33 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 16:26 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] Make libc symbols hidden in static PIE Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-18 21:37 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-01-19 18:25 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] fix ifunc with static pie [BZ #27072] Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 19:41 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 20:16 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-19 21:38 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-01-20 11:29 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-01-20 12:38 ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-01-20 12:49 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f68b24a-437c-db8e-d1fa-b26d2e06d103@linaro.org \
--to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).