From: Vladislav Khmelevsky via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, woodard@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] elf: Fix rtld-audit trampoline for aarch64
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 22:51:23 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8E908272-FB79-4940-9183-A705EDA36D05@yandex.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3180cd8a-a3e2-b6bb-cb6a-af7c2a4fca22@linaro.org>
Thanks! But I would need some guidance from you if you don't mind. First of all I don't have write access to the repo, I would very appreciate if you or somebody would help me to merge this :)
> 17 нояб. 2022 г., в 22:36, Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> написал(а):
>
>
>
> On 17/11/22 15:23, Vladislav Khmelevsky wrote:
>> Thank you for reviewing!
>> Yes, it is true tat inly x0/x1 are used as return register. But I have a specific audit library code that was storing some metadata in a free registers during plt entrer and reading it during plt exit :) As for a normal use cases both problems doesn't really affect anything.
>>
>
> Fair enough, although we might want to backport this.
>
> Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
>
>>> 17 нояб. 2022 г., в 22:15, Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> написал(а):
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/11/22 05:47, Vladislav Khmelevsky wrote:
>>>> This patch fixes two problems with audit:
>>>> 1. The DL_OFFSET_RV_VPCS offset was mixed up with DL_OFFSET_RG_VPCS,
>>>> resulting in x2 register value nulling in RG structure.
>>>> 2. We need to preserve the x8 register before function call, but don't have
>>>> to save it's new value and restore it before return. Anyway the final
>>>> restore was using OFFSET_RV instead of OFFSET_RG value which is wrong (althoug doesn't affect anything).
>>>
>>> Patch looks ok, although I think currently the ABI only uses x0 and/or x1
>>> to return value (for __int128_t for instance). So I think it should not
>>> be a user-visible issue (at least tst-audit26 does check that lr_vpcs
>>> and lrv_vpcs are zeroed). Are you seeing any issue with current code?
>>> If so could you open a bug please?
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> sysdeps/aarch64/dl-trampoline.S | 4 +---
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/sysdeps/aarch64/dl-trampoline.S b/sysdeps/aarch64/dl-trampoline.S
>>>> index 909b208578..d66f0b9c45 100644
>>>> --- a/sysdeps/aarch64/dl-trampoline.S
>>>> +++ b/sysdeps/aarch64/dl-trampoline.S
>>>> @@ -298,12 +298,11 @@ _dl_runtime_profile:
>>>> stp x2, x3, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_X0 + 16*1]
>>>> stp x4, x5, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_X0 + 16*2]
>>>> stp x6, x7, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_X0 + 16*3]
>>>> - str x8, [x29, #OFFSET_RG + DL_OFFSET_RG_X0 + 16*4]
>>>> stp q0, q1, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_V0 + 32*0]
>>>> stp q2, q3, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_V0 + 32*1]
>>>> stp q4, q5, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_V0 + 32*2]
>>>> stp q6, q7, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_V0 + 32*3]
>>>> - str xzr, [X29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RG_VPCS]
>>>> + str xzr, [X29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_VPCS]
>>>>
>>>> /* Setup call to pltexit */
>>>> ldp x0, x1, [x29, #OFFSET_SAVED_CALL_X0]
>>>> @@ -315,7 +314,6 @@ _dl_runtime_profile:
>>>> ldp x2, x3, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_X0 + 16*1]
>>>> ldp x4, x5, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_X0 + 16*2]
>>>> ldp x6, x7, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_X0 + 16*3]
>>>> - ldr x8, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_X0 + 16*4]
>>>> ldp q0, q1, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_V0 + 32*0]
>>>> ldp q2, q3, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_V0 + 32*1]
>>>> ldp q4, q5, [x29, #OFFSET_RV + DL_OFFSET_RV_V0 + 32*2]
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 8:47 [PATCH] elf: Fix rtld-audit trampoline for aarch64 Vladislav Khmelevsky via Libc-alpha
2022-11-17 18:15 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto via Libc-alpha
2022-11-17 18:23 ` Vladislav Khmelevsky via Libc-alpha
2022-11-17 18:36 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto via Libc-alpha
2022-11-17 18:51 ` Vladislav Khmelevsky via Libc-alpha [this message]
2022-12-02 18:20 ` Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8E908272-FB79-4940-9183-A705EDA36D05@yandex.ru \
--to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=och95@yandex.ru \
--cc=woodard@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).