Re: [PATCH 2/5] nptl: Convert tst-cond11.c to use libsupport

[Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>]

* Adhemerval Zanella:

> I will check the following patch to fix it:
>
> ---
> diff --git a/support/timespec.c b/support/timespec.c
> index f1b88c1f4c..653293970a 100644
> --- a/support/timespec.c
> +++ b/support/timespec.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  
>  #include <support/timespec.h>
>  #include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
>  
>  void
>  test_timespec_before_impl (const char *file, int line,
> @@ -29,12 +30,12 @@ test_timespec_before_impl (const char *file, int line,
>           && left.tv_nsec > right.tv_nsec)) {
>      support_record_failure ();
>      const struct timespec diff = timespec_sub (left, right);
> -    printf ("%s:%d: %ld.%09lds not before %ld.%09lds "
> -           "(difference %ld.%09lds)n",
> +    printf ("%s:%d: %jd.%09jds not before %jd.%09jds "
> +           "(difference %jd.%09jds)n",
>             file, line,
> -           left.tv_sec, left.tv_nsec,
> -           right.tv_sec, right.tv_nsec,
> -           diff.tv_sec, diff.tv_nsec);
> +           (intmax_t) left.tv_sec, (intmax_t) left.tv_nsec,
> +           (intmax_t) right.tv_sec, (intmax_t) right.tv_nsec,
> +           (intmax_t) diff.tv_sec, (intmax_t) diff.tv_nsec);
>    }
>  }
>  
> @@ -48,11 +49,11 @@ test_timespec_equal_or_after_impl (const char *file, int line,
>           && left.tv_nsec < right.tv_nsec)) {
>      support_record_failure ();
>      const struct timespec diff = timespec_sub (right, left);
> -    printf ("%s:%d: %ld.%09lds not after %ld.%09lds "
> -           "(difference %ld.%09lds)n",
> +    printf ("%s:%d: %jd.%09jds not after %jd.%09jds "
> +           "(difference %jd.%09jds)n",
>             file, line,
> -           left.tv_sec, left.tv_nsec,
> -           right.tv_sec, right.tv_nsec,
> -           diff.tv_sec, diff.tv_nsec);
> +           (intmax_t) left.tv_sec, (intmax_t) left.tv_nsec,
> +           (intmax_t) right.tv_sec, (intmax_t) right.tv_nsec,
> +           (intmax_t) diff.tv_sec, (intmax_t) diff.tv_nsec);
>    }

Looks okay to me.

Thanks,
Florian