unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org,  adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org,
	goldstein.w.n@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stdlib: Optimize number of calls to comparison function
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 09:20:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y1eaxtst.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231202214839.2634493-1-visitorckw@gmail.com> (Kuan-Wei Chiu's message of "Sun, 3 Dec 2023 05:48:39 +0800")

* Kuan-Wei Chiu:

> The current heapsort implementation in the siftdown function follows
> the standard textbook version, necessitating two comparisons at each
> level. Transitioning to the Bottom-up heapsort version allows us to
> decrease the required comparisons to just one per level. On average,
> this modification significantly reduces the comparison count from
> 2nlog2(n) - 3n + o(n) to nlog2(n) + 0.37*n + o(n).

I think the factor in stdlib/tst-qsort5.c needs to be adjusted:

  /* This is an arbitrary factor which is true for the current
     implementation across a wide range of sizes.  */
  TEST_VERIFY (factor <= 4.5);

On the other hand, the heapsort code is not really expected to run at
all in the current implementation because median-of-three quicksort
usually avoids degenerating behavior.  If this heapsort variant uses a
number of comparisons that is competitive to quicksort, maybe we should
use it instead?  And use insertion sort for short arrays only.

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-04  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-02 21:48 [PATCH] stdlib: Optimize number of calls to comparison function Kuan-Wei Chiu
2023-12-04  8:20 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2023-12-04 18:31   ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2023-12-05 10:44     ` Florian Weimer
2023-12-05 20:00       ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2023-12-05 20:35     ` Zack Weinberg
2023-12-06 10:21       ` Florian Weimer
2023-12-06 12:51         ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-12-17 15:42           ` Zack Weinberg
2023-12-17 15:55             ` Florian Weimer
2023-12-17 16:47             ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2023-12-17 18:02               ` Florian Weimer
2023-12-05  3:22   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] stdlib: Optimize number of calls to comparison function in qsort Kuan-Wei Chiu
2023-12-05  3:22     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Kuan-Wei Chiu
2023-12-05  3:22     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] stdlib: Adjust the factor in tst-qsort5 Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-02-16  7:08 ` [PATCH] stdlib: Optimize number of calls to comparison function Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-03-27 19:45   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2024-03-27 19:59     ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2024-03-27 20:42       ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y1eaxtst.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).