From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92FF91F463 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 15:51:41 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=pqDpGqGHSwptJJBSsOW1lc/eRr2z774DR60uyj75pc9 7MpWNY+cy0tURynxVM0z7R/0Mz8UMyClk8NUb9zG8MwqPyCOVqHrxH/xMjW07K53 yJc1DEtkp51IIHZXAhra0gom7RbaJekGa+aJOqLa/9Ztds2v3Z/1iLz0hl772wmY = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=nNauFlnZN33UKuBF9N/OgA9XAbQ=; b=kupT7Dr8xFV6sqGUt frZBtTjKDjfqj0GlPQGlNjPipEkpZITNlg1dufyCc77tQL/OKYndOJYnIjP1N+15 lNloJ8EOeMPDqhebql1GAXSfHdnMhR7AbB5/9G7aFFMzk+mZwzg6QhTc7dQAxXsH UrtjtQwUfUPLxXTpWIlBIN2c0E= Received: (qmail 24110 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2019 15:51:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24092 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2019 15:51:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com From: Florian Weimer To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [Question] ifunc odering in ELF References: <1568314984.28076.65.camel@blackberry.com> <87pnjzy75u.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <66583af6-6049-7f1d-0a31-a77a228cf603@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:51:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <66583af6-6049-7f1d-0a31-a77a228cf603@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella's message of "Tue, 17 Sep 2019 10:24:53 -0300") Message-ID: <87v9tnezju.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Adhemerval Zanella: > That's was not my impression, I this we should to go this way iff we can't > really make IFUNC reordering work on loader. From your initial work on > the two-phase IFUNC relocation, which prevents us to move forward? No one said, =E2=80=9Cyes, we do need this feature in the loader=E2=80=9D. (Keep in mind that it does not solve all ordering problems, the example in this thread would still break.) Thanks, Florian