From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4DE1F4B5 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 05:47:21 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=ELtic qqk8YMEOdRZ18v9kvFsC4yd6uHuahn6IKX56DnGz4IcsgdUeCmtql4x1Cl6dH7WR Ti83biKGCOCGiGINP8WyG7O0J4sxdm+YjzRZKTCSLhoD5HwaBNcJxquWky+5/i5D PmwDiEzABegw7GJ6BS8/dRgcbLtfn6mLHwKoWs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=hzsLkv+romD insV85JjXDssQOe4=; b=Af8GGHmgkF/QNlYTauqDlJSpJLjB+wvyw8IWNKhebVw 0Gzmdxpx3wFXxraX59UINWDFp571jPH+Y6bBeOvExORqBQBzUlSAnHN/ClH1KXs5 AnQvn7xGNLixpM+BPxlq77Umu9awYjleNvDXsK1F0WsWR8KS86J99nyXvBwrTI1o = Received: (qmail 10563 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2019 05:47:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10554 invoked by uid 89); 13 Nov 2019 05:47:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: albireo.enyo.de From: Florian Weimer To: Sandra Loosemore Cc: Joseph Myers , Florian Weimer , , Szabolcs Nagy , , Subject: Re: [review v3] slotinfo in struct dtv_slotinfo_list should be flexible array [BZ #25... References: <20191112114732.2175B20AF6@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io> <4e7ad8ea-43ae-6af6-d2a9-2a05d42b0cc6@codesourcery.com> <87r22dey2c.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <55541dd4-7e5e-e7ec-ae17-e9904041780e@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 06:47:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <55541dd4-7e5e-e7ec-ae17-e9904041780e@codesourcery.com> (Sandra Loosemore's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:59:47 -0700") Message-ID: <87v9ro9vl6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain * Sandra Loosemore: > OK, having a self-contained test case is very helpful. I'll take a look > at fixing this in GCC, although I might not get to it for a few days. > Probably the solution is to not use GP-relative addressing for any > object declared with a flexible array member. Thanks for looking into this. Should I file a GCC PR?