From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Cc: GLIBC Devel <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: 2.31: < 2 weeks to go
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 15:30:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9qbgjco.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0645ee7d-59c9-cb2f-ebe5-ef613c8094cf@gotplt.org> (Siddhesh Poyarekar's message of "Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:05:38 +0530")
* Siddhesh Poyarekar:
> Less than two weeks to go for 2.31 freeze. I intend to announce a
> freeze on 31st December around afternoon IST. Here's a reminder that if
> you'd like your patchset considered for inclusion during the freeze, it
> needs to be in the blockers list on the release page[1]. Please cc me
> in patch pings if you haven't been able to get reviews and need attention.
What should we do about the built-in system call tables? I think it's
desirable to have this in the release to get a well-defined system call
profile after the the Y2038 changes. Otherwise, there will be a lot of
variance regarding the system calls glibc makes depending on which
version of the kernel headers glibc was built with.
<https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-12/msg00567.html>
The actual code changes (the first two patches) could go in before the
build-many-glibcs.py changes have been reviewed. I think the updating
logic now follows Joseph's suggestion, but I don't know if the changes I
did on build-many-glibcs.py are acceptable from a consistency/style
perspective.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-20 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-20 3:35 2.31: < 2 weeks to go Siddhesh Poyarekar
2019-12-20 3:56 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-12-20 9:45 ` Arjun Shankar
2019-12-24 14:36 ` Chung-Lin Tang
2019-12-27 12:39 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-01-07 19:29 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-12-20 14:30 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2019-12-22 17:38 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2019-12-22 18:59 ` Joseph Myers
2019-12-30 12:20 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2019-12-30 15:00 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9qbgjco.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).