unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
	Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Added optimized memcpy/memmove/memset for A64FX
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 20:53:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tuobibb1.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB559991EE24FFB21C1258B71783709@VE1PR08MB5599.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha's message of "Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:52:05 +0000")

* Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha:

> 5. Odd prefetches
>
> I have a hard time believing first prefetching the data to be
> written, then clearing it using DC ZVA (???), then prefetching the
> same data a 2nd time, before finally write the loaded data is
> helping performance...  Generally hardware prefetchers are able to
> do exactly the right thing since memcpy is trivial to prefetch.  So
> what is the performance gain of each prefetch/clear step? What is
> the difference between memcpy and memmove performance (given memmove
> doesn't do any of this)?

Another downside is exposure of latent concurrency bugs:

  G1: Phantom zeros in cardtable
  <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039042>

I guess the CPU's heritage is shining through here. 8-)

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-12 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-12 12:52 [PATCH 0/5] Added optimized memcpy/memmove/memset for A64FX Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-04-12 18:53 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2021-04-13 12:07 ` naohirot
2021-04-14 16:02   ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-04-15 12:20     ` naohirot
2021-04-20 16:00       ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-04-27 11:58         ` naohirot
2021-04-29 15:13           ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-04-30 15:01             ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-04-30 15:23               ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-04-30 15:30                 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-30 15:40                   ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-05-04  7:56                     ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-05-04 10:17                       ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-05-04 10:38                         ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-05-04 10:42                         ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-05-04 11:07                           ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-05-06 10:01             ` naohirot
2021-05-06 14:26               ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-05-06 15:09                 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-05-06 17:31               ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-05-07 12:31                 ` naohirot
2021-04-19  2:51     ` naohirot
2021-04-19 14:57       ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-04-21 10:10         ` naohirot
2021-04-21 15:02           ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-04-22 13:17             ` naohirot
2021-04-23  0:58               ` naohirot
2021-04-19 12:43     ` naohirot
2021-04-20  3:31     ` naohirot
2021-04-20 14:44       ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-04-27  9:01         ` naohirot
2021-04-20  5:49     ` naohirot
2021-04-20 11:39       ` Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
2021-04-27 11:03         ` naohirot
2021-04-23 13:22     ` naohirot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-17  2:28 Naohiro Tamura
2021-03-29 12:03 ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-05-10  1:45 ` naohirot
2021-05-14 13:35   ` Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha
2021-05-19  0:11     ` naohirot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tuobibb1.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de \
    --to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).