From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14D651F4B5 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:18:26 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=gOtHC7QopYKSVFEGRv0xQ4yB7tdbh/F7yvLWMV7pYes UQfk0vVmV6RaoPD8sK0LbBjZv9OprYhqh+gfgR9d65SSdXPx+OoAzSOVzjrxEO/c V5ui+mff4V7K6xvURJQLfed1l73uup7zqexMR1ATSkfc2bojvVvFcrxXOj9xSwNg = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=PWBiubu9E3xSGyscousFe7++RwY=; b=Nx4u13OMtAI+ELRuC XvRmMe4HzAj4jtV/M2eBM7IwKtCV/tkq4dmzNKd/ZegNrZktlbQjkdvkxxshg5SO 3KpfVE1HP2h3aYAslLYzspqu2chbD/9EwWmtkbcrQuQ+X/ca+p7NFyvR1ZKbaaRI RZwE8LEeKtKFDwzYh0nCi3I5m0= Received: (qmail 41801 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2019 22:18:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 41793 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2019 22:18:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: albireo.enyo.de From: Florian Weimer To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: Sandra Loosemore , Joseph Myers , Florian Weimer , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Szabolcs Nagy , cltang@codesourcery.com, andrew@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [review v3] slotinfo in struct dtv_slotinfo_list should be flexible array [BZ #25... References: <20191112114732.2175B20AF6@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io> <4e7ad8ea-43ae-6af6-d2a9-2a05d42b0cc6@codesourcery.com> <87r22dey2c.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <320362b6-854f-230e-5db8-af20f66ef838@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:18:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <320362b6-854f-230e-5db8-af20f66ef838@redhat.com> (Carlos O'Donell's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:14:49 -0500") Message-ID: <87sgmsbuxn.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Carlos O'Donell: > If the new glibc cannot be compiled with gcc8 or gcc9 for nios2, then tha= t's > a problem though. It immediately makes it difficult to test a new glibc on > existing systems without upgrading the system compiler. I don't think nios2 systems have system compilers as such =E2=80=A6 > How long will that take and is it OK to leave things in a broken > state for that long for a given target like nios2? Maybe we should back the fix out and see how quickly we can get in the other GCC 10 patches?