From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36E211F463 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:08:22 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=POkDQjLV8dmHKO2TZMMjfVushWgKL82VJKQlL5J21Ys rmfywIa5yIYXxBW6Nuckmq7+/gPS1vVah5iR1IO5DkeX1m7gjoBIQrUNwcx6XId3 QBApiMCyTCRoezkDra9BOGdCccUVJah0a/sM+TtWQ9JfEIfDMyEG23248JCwYr4k = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=eVoS2LyYIXI1R1vcOiya47MzVGo=; b=ZDnc0telbVJsH+yKY 75nRnBI28mYB01vhH/qrWiLXJNNRB8t9i0K3A3uFq53xApN4uy/a1VGhNGqzliff JeywpG8WhAlsg2SQ7oJAB1KHp++QAp5SkvsKdR8wbmfKE0aY/ee+16r1/FPfnkaM c2IbUqaUWTsKDKDv9XKS3hKBpE= Received: (qmail 94664 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2019 10:08:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 94656 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2019 10:08:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1576663696; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2BghppqpEFNZpEXxWD1Gd4E8c/l3uAgWJ0ISaYKjKaU=; b=Np5QMyUVWIW62O1maYn22b+sKrF5TvMdJkzHnoaG6d+Bsn2NKqjlDkEeeOBKGdZyf+uIgD UwPl7FGDrjM0G4p73PlCPYwEIM6ohutol5sKlZHiJslGxhK1Mwrk+oL7k5/y3CBrHRFtkt pmLv2g+VqhQkkRbRDxd5fv/wUU0XAN0= From: Florian Weimer To: Rafal Luzynski Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] manual: Document compiler and memory barriers References: <87sglxclvd.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <2109810439.85992.1576104872246@poczta.nazwa.pl> <87d0cthg1l.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <883459047.482521.1576620372220@poczta.nazwa.pl> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:08:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <883459047.482521.1576620372220@poczta.nazwa.pl> (Rafal Luzynski's message of "Tue, 17 Dec 2019 23:06:12 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <87r2122bg9.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Rafal Luzynski: > 12.12.2019 13:41 Florian Weimer wrote: >>=20 >> * Rafal Luzynski: >>=20 >> > [...] >> > AFAIK "e.g.," should be "e.g.,@:" to avoid a long space which should >> > normally be used between sentences. >>=20 >> I think the Texinfo manual is incomplete. Clearly this does not happen >> for all such periods, only those that are followed by whitespace in some >> sense. It's not easy to infer this from the Texinfo sources, but I >> think that . ? ! followed by any of " ' ) ] (, possibly with repeats, >> followed by whitespace causes that whitespace to be widened. So =E2=80= =9Ce.g.,=E2=80=9D >> should be fine on its own. > > I am not an expert but I was told this here: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-10/msg01302.html > > Also I think I did some tests by that time and indeed there was a differe= nce > in the PDF version. But maybe my memory is bad. I just tried it, and I don't see a difference in following whitespace between =E2=80=9Ce.g.,=E2=80=9D and e.g.,@:=E2=80=9D. Thanks, Florian