From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-97980-e=80x24.org@sourceware.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 370F5211B3
	for <e@80x24.org>; Wed,  5 Dec 2018 15:35:31 +0000 (UTC)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=TAUgp
	FCyL9pEd1shIZj/ltzDX7AHF9FYuNZSvYg3LJfp+nIvQwOfJGhpIROHSMr8Sbxlc
	50dyxWZRcCfNAWnX2iZJXMXNcYLS3DB1r5F2NEdZpVCMG4ib0XYzXMhOh+/4ICYu
	A1khX9eYT9fLDDwNHAOBn9exzlWnhnYW4vUNmg=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=rS6YOebSW84
	hjE/RAWR1f0MjBMI=; b=NbQqd6M1+/TQz9ZDTyxGM43n9O8sfWtYW+CdG3jlCif
	jyaC0vePeJ0nNBHySFmP/WWVxNndLu34W7ZdQM1N+wR8ddr88cS2CNcpyxHZBlYc
	MeCeVp3UOduVt8Bddl6TPLuKgKeY1H949y+V1z6pq3tx4pR04xLwiKBuz9ZQ6/CQ
	=
Received: (qmail 104076 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2018 15:35:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-unsubscribe-e=80x24.org@sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 104038 invoked by uid 89); 5 Dec 2018 15:35:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Add getcpu wrapper
References: <CAMe9rOpcy16tREX8Gb0qYPXXc__Vzykj2c=M20aBOn4p0gUBGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 16:35:20 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOpcy16tREX8Gb0qYPXXc__Vzykj2c=M20aBOn4p0gUBGw@mail.gmail.com>
	(H. J. Lu's message of "Wed, 5 Dec 2018 06:29:28 -0800")
Message-ID: <87pnuggf5z.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

* H. J. Lu:

> returns such info.  But syscall () is too slow.  I'd like to add a wrapper to
> glibc.   Any comments?

We already have it as sched_getcpu, I think.

Thanks,
Florian