From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7C3C1F5AE for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A608A3857020; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:33:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F8B33857C66 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:32:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 8F8B33857C66 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=whitebox@nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1Pzs37ynz1qt3l; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:32:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1Pzs2lL1z1r571; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:32:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1z5bFS_obFwb; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:32:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: YeOnTBvjSKfopqNzYckevdKd3Aq/serX8IJjicPtwJhh6r6F9DrSFIABNXRWollz Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-172-45.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.172.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:32:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F1B82C1E45; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:32:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use size_t for mallinfo fields. References: <87tuyja59i.fsf@igel.home> <87v9izxwo7.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <87lfjvxv58.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> X-Yow: Don't SANFORIZE me!! Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:32:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lfjvxv58.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Tue, 07 Jul 2020 16:22:11 +0200") Message-ID: <87pn979yzr.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On Jul 07 2020, Florian Weimer wrote: > If what I wrote above is right (we'd first gather consensus around > that), we should probably add struct mallinfo2 and mallinfo2, deprecate > the original mallinfo function, and eventually remove them from the > public API (turning the original mallinfo into a compatibility symbol). Isn't mallinfo obsoleted by malloc_info anyway? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."