From: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
Emil Velikov via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nptl_db: Support different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744)
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:20:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmyc9r23.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875z08nczm.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:11:41 +0200")
* Florian Weimer:
> * Emil Velikov:
>
>> On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 11:57, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > Are there any plans for glibc 2.33.1 or shall I ask the Arch Linux
>>> > maintainers to include this in the package?
>>>
>>> I'm going to backport it to the release branch, but we probably won't
>>> make an actual 2.33.1 release from it. So it depends on what Arch Linux
>>> does with the release branch.
>
>> I can see the patch landed in master \o/ but it's missing in the 2.33 branch.
>> Did it slip through the cracks or you're simply EBUSY with the
>> nptl/c11 pthread to libc transition?
>
> I wanted to give it a test in Fedora rawhide, but we cannot rebuild
> glibc there due to an unrelated issue right now.
>
> I can backport it blindly if it helps.
I've now backported it to the 2.33 release branch.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-30 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-16 18:37 [PATCH v2] nptl_db: Support different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744) Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-19 10:50 ` Emil Velikov via Libc-alpha
2021-04-19 10:57 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-27 11:46 ` Emil Velikov via Libc-alpha
2021-04-27 12:11 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-30 7:20 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-05-04 11:48 ` Emil Velikov via Libc-alpha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmyc9r23.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).