unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Deprecate 32-bit off_t support
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:58:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k1jkpojo.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412315d3-73df-3e8b-e3a0-da21fb29d396@gotplt.org> (Siddhesh Poyarekar's message of "Fri, 4 Jan 2019 18:20:28 +0530")

* Siddhesh Poyarekar:

> On 04/01/19 6:15 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>> On 04/01/19 6:09 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
>>> index cc20102fda..2f601c6217 100644
>>> --- a/NEWS
>>> +++ b/NEWS
>>> @@ -85,6 +85,15 @@ Deprecated and removed features, and other
>>> changes affecting compatibility:
>>>     as all functions that call vscanf, vfscanf, or vsscanf are
>>> annotated with
>>>     __attribute__ ((format (scanf, ...))).
>>> +* A future release of glibc will use a 64-bit off_t type on all
>>
>> Wouldn't it be clearer to fix the 'future release' to a specific
>> timeline, say, 2.31 (to give a year+ to change offending code) so
>> that this doesn't sound like a vague threat and there's actually a
>> time bound for people to work with?

2.31 sounds okay to me.  2.30 would work for me as well.  What do others
think?

> Oh, and a warning under #if _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 32 that warns about
> the deprecation?

Due to -Werror, that alone would be rather disruptive.  It's too late to
add this for 2.29, too.

Thanks,
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-04 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-04 12:39 [PATCH] Deprecate 32-bit off_t support Florian Weimer
2019-01-04 12:45 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2019-01-04 12:50   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2019-01-04 12:58     ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2019-01-04 16:13       ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2019-01-04 16:39   ` Joseph Myers
2019-01-04 13:15 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2019-01-04 13:46   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2019-01-07 18:25   ` Florian Weimer
2019-01-07 22:17     ` Joseph Myers
2019-01-08  0:06       ` Paul Eggert
2019-01-08  8:08       ` Florian Weimer
2019-01-17 21:29 ` Guillem Jover
2019-01-18 10:09   ` Florian Weimer
2019-01-18 14:11     ` Adhemerval Zanella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k1jkpojo.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).