From: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc] nptl_db: different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:28:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fszqnqi3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <625ec5fe-bd09-860a-f617-745042b94011@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:25:15 +0100")
* Pedro Alves:
> IIRC, the order which libraries are loaded by GDB hasn't changed. The
> issue is that until recently (before glibc 1daccf403b1b), the stacks
> lists lived in libpthread (stack_used/__stack_user), so the fact that
> GDB loaded libthread_db.so before ld.so's symbols were loaded didn't
> make a difference. Now they were moved to ld.so, so libthread_db.so
> can't find them until GDB reads the ld.so symbols. Is this assessment
> correct?
Yes, I believe this is what happens.
I assume that ldd shows objects in link map order, the it looks like
this:
$ ldd /usr/bin/python3
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff1f8d5000)
libpython3.9.so.1.0 => /lib64/libpython3.9.so.1.0 (0x00007f3fd7782000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f3fd75b7000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f3fd7595000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f3fd758e000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib64/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f3fd7589000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f3fd7443000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f3fd7af7000)
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-16 15:56 [PATCH glibc] nptl_db: different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744) Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:07 ` Simon Marchi via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:12 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:25 ` Pedro Alves via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:28 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-04-16 16:33 ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 16:43 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:47 ` Pedro Alves via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:53 ` Simon Marchi via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 17:18 ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 17:26 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 17:33 ` Simon Marchi via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 18:29 ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 18:35 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 17:28 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 17:43 ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-19 9:06 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fszqnqi3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).