unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
	Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc] nptl_db: different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:28:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fszqnqi3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <625ec5fe-bd09-860a-f617-745042b94011@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:25:15 +0100")

* Pedro Alves:

> IIRC, the order which libraries are loaded by GDB hasn't changed.  The
> issue is that until recently (before glibc 1daccf403b1b), the stacks
> lists lived in libpthread (stack_used/__stack_user), so the fact that
> GDB loaded libthread_db.so before ld.so's symbols were loaded didn't
> make a difference.  Now they were moved to ld.so, so libthread_db.so
> can't find them until GDB reads the ld.so symbols.  Is this assessment
> correct?

Yes, I believe this is what happens.

I assume that ldd shows objects in link map order, the it looks like
this:

$ ldd /usr/bin/python3
	linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff1f8d5000)
	libpython3.9.so.1.0 => /lib64/libpython3.9.so.1.0 (0x00007f3fd7782000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f3fd75b7000)
	libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f3fd7595000)
	libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f3fd758e000)
	libutil.so.1 => /lib64/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f3fd7589000)
	libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f3fd7443000)
	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f3fd7af7000)

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16 15:56 [PATCH glibc] nptl_db: different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744) Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:07 ` Simon Marchi via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:12   ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:25   ` Pedro Alves via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:28     ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-04-16 16:33       ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 16:43         ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:47           ` Pedro Alves via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 16:53             ` Simon Marchi via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 17:18               ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 17:26                 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 17:33                 ` Simon Marchi via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 18:29                   ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 18:35                   ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 17:28             ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha
2021-04-16 17:43               ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-19  9:06                 ` Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fszqnqi3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).