From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A540C1F5AE for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682563958C02; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:13:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 682563958C02 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1620134005; bh=6LzmaH3GVDsD9mN3M/Q/3qoRGeip9SEvfrCCYy1Rv6s=; h=To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=sAl6mLHTkieyEHNpAH5xipTLRq62puqO3rO+c0iaohVnYh3ee1+a1ithajm99mpSI udQuaqy5Ip+KZVHY6bRvW1NEjeBwipQsYD7Iwya3+/0Nee46C8LdZkJRGDwXZKnh7r RJwhCz0xXVLhfGkUM08jyHlpnDgP8bXDr4O+eauU= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5593954C76 for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:13:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2F5593954C76 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-171-WWcjlY8LMAmeln1CqZnj9w-1; Tue, 04 May 2021 09:13:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: WWcjlY8LMAmeln1CqZnj9w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA78801817; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-112-137.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.137]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E99F010023AC; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:13:18 +0000 (UTC) To: "H.J. Lu" Subject: Re: [RFC] elf: Implement filtering of symbols historically defined in libpthread References: <87h7jqguew.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87k0oeln6s.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87wnsek7ku.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87sg32k79x.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87lf8uk6u2.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:13:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: (H. J. Lu's message of "Tue, 4 May 2021 06:06:12 -0700") Message-ID: <87fsz2k5fm.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Florian Weimer Cc: Andreas Schwab , GNU C Library Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" * H. J. Lu: > Why re-linking is needed for the binary executable test? I don't want us to bundle the sources of an old glibc version, just to comply with the LGPL requirements for one single test (or talk to legal folks to figure out if this is required). Thanks, Florian