From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB581F4B5 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:36:00 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=pUEdaGADJYpW5PxcgJEi4hopbguLTKfD4uDIbvlbXge UtqKKXUG3JNp7iHnqhdg44/2heLCDgq6y6+FlsAxsG9dLcJzK2Rnzjjd6lLPaZ4r 5NwJXfBUWe3DCznhWOnx8yabk76WMUOAnPstEBQ2YjHDXfLwZ+h5gJXM58Lshki4 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=uRziG7NtccfYqKNIXC90Ahto6uE=; b=AID0XY01kd671gDgD gFriVXAYy+VpGHYepK0zvgewRj4JtblN1H7J31fbkJzELb1k0Z/Bp7J+iNO45ydG swaQFGvCi1gPj5ulLvYIQCLeUOaHnfPLK7zLYj/5zchImD5S7J/DhiSk8TArf6Q2 ls4rG3yHjsq3WPHy/KI2nL4qzY= Received: (qmail 16811 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2019 10:35:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16723 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2019 10:35:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1573554950; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GCokKBBOgJTCnmSqmG3jkQJiUM+5VByOr4OQPYirJUw=; b=fvYC653erqzqR0NsD1naiPdp2hxaeW5vweN/cEXmfnCJF8T4L5tppPQCaRuTW1NxoQFPTq EnTgAHDQWJlHNIxHABTZZKS5wFHzn0C+wI++RJo1lKxT4ZHQ6a7DmCz3AWBSg9A4jTmfKe DYR7znmRBRm330EkBDKqLn52FJU6FOI= From: Florian Weimer To: Szabolcs Nagy Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior , nd , "libc-alpha\@sourceware.org" , "Florian Weimer \(Code Review\)" , Carlos O'Donell , Simon Marchi Subject: Re: [review] slotinfo in struct dtv_slotinfo_list should be flexible array [BZ #25... References: <55ff0c8a-b016-220c-c657-43b2f9308e5b@arm.com> <87bltpm0wd.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <566ecda0-be75-7f46-4abf-c68cceb0640f@arm.com> <87lfsmwioq.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <874kza1477.fsf@redhat.com> <70ef6974-e397-fc09-10d1-39ec5d4f53cb@arm.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:35:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <70ef6974-e397-fc09-10d1-39ec5d4f53cb@arm.com> (Szabolcs Nagy's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2019 10:22:33 +0000") Message-ID: <87eeydqt50.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Szabolcs Nagy: > On 11/11/2019 21:41, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> I've manually activated your account, Szabolcs. I don't know why you >> didn't receive the email; you should have. I checked the postfix log on >> the machine and saw that two emails have been sent to your address. >> Maybe they were flagged as spam? We have other people using @arm.com >> emails registered, and they didn't have problems. > > thanks, now login worked. > > i clicked to resend the email more than 5 times > over a period of a week, so if there were only 2 > emails sent that sounds wrong. i think arm might > have had temporary IT problems, but not for a > whole week. It could be that the mail setup for osci.io is too non-standard for your corporate mail provider. Red Hat has outsourced its inbound mail relays over the weekend, so I can sympathize. 8-/ Sergio, have you been in contact with the people at osci.io? I can talk to them about fixing some of the issues I see, but whether that removes the remaining obstacles to successful mail delivery is hard to predict. Thanks, Florian