From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS17314 8.43.84.0/22 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D4A1F8C6 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:54:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEA239AE842 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:54:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CBEA239AE842 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1627545256; bh=4KHBEIG46gMnp42qWWKvYC3ehPjTiCh/iwieRajcDWk=; h=To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=G8USHoHHMWe8XHMkQq9toHkmtBdsUVbAhxSNNYqPRQv0CZ8fazHs3yksManpsthKf xuZzPvGTW8vFMD1n8gKzVBmrbSNvtsXPLfIZQDm9vjyP2HqDRGJ8F5KbTUpKSCEhUX R43f+V3DmHsZNtKkROTfmYy+YxyeVUnT9tJAfbtg= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591333858018 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:53:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 591333858018 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-558-yV6ck9xPMGmH1226MfS_sA-1; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 03:53:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yV6ck9xPMGmH1226MfS_sA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF03180196C for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-112-7.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.7]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 152BB5D9DC; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 07:53:50 +0000 (UTC) To: Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] C.UTF-8 References: <20210729063515.1541388-1-carlos@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 09:53:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210729063515.1541388-1-carlos@redhat.com> (Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha's message of "Thu, 29 Jul 2021 02:35:12 -0400") Message-ID: <87bl6l5zeb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Florian Weimer Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" * Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha: > The following changes implement a minimally sized C.UTF-8. > First we implement the 'strcmp_collation' directive. > Then we implement C.UTF-8 with an LC_COLLATE that uses the > 'strcmp_collation' directive to support using strcmp for > collation i.e. code point sorting. The final C.UTF-8 is > only ~396KiB with the largest ~346KiB in LC_CTYPE for all > of Unicode. > > This v4 fixes the regressions detected in Fedora Rawhide > here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986421 > Additional testing coverage is provided for fnmatch, regcomp, > and regexec (which would have caught the regression). >From a high-level point of view I wonder if the more conservative choice would be to fix the localdef generation for LC_COLLATE, at least for this release. It would also mean that we do not break statically linked executables. Thanks, Florian