unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Vinay Kumar <vinay.m.engg@gmail.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org,  carlos@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Thread stack and heap caches - CVE-2019-1010024
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 13:25:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878sovvnef.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANUMPcXr+asjC32M1qENUEkBvNj4SGsvE6jNNwsV55H5EhkRiw@mail.gmail.com> (Vinay Kumar's message of "Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:39:58 +0530")

* Vinay Kumar:

> Regarding bug related to Thread stack and heap caches (CVE-2019-1010024).
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22852
>
>>> One way to harden is to use a tunable for a thread stack cache, and set that to zero.
> Below change in glibc allocatestack.c file gives the expected output
> with test case. Verified on x86_64 target.
> =======================================================
> --- a/nptl/allocatestack.c
> +++ b/nptl/allocatestack.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ get_cached_stack (size_t *sizep, void **memp)
>        struct pthread *curr;
>
>        curr = list_entry (entry, struct pthread, list);
> +      curr->stackblock_size = 0;
>        if (FREE_P (curr) && curr->stackblock_size >= size)
>         {
>           if (curr->stackblock_size == size)
> =======================================================

Does this really change the randomization?  Won't the kernel map the new
stack at a predictable address, too?

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-04 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-04 11:09 Thread stack and heap caches - CVE-2019-1010024 Vinay Kumar
2019-11-04 12:25 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2019-11-11 10:56   ` Vinay Kumar
2019-11-25 16:43     ` Vinay Kumar
2019-11-25 18:10 ` Florian Weimer
2019-11-25 18:29   ` Vinay Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878sovvnef.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=vinay.m.engg@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).