unofficial mirror of libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] nptl: Introduce and use FUTEX_LOCK_PI2
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 16:20:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878s2f8t6p.fsf@kurt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b3c3bc1-1738-9b05-4557-776f31430cb5@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 743 bytes --]

On Fri Jul 09 2021, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Patch looks ok in general, I think I have only minor comments.  I see that
> FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 is already on Linus tree, should it should be safe to assume
> it will on v5.14 (although is not yet released).
>
> We are in the slush freeze for the 2.34 release, so you would like to check
> with Carlos O'Donell if this set is suitable to inclusion.  It does not
> change any ABI, but I will need to some time to boot a kernel to actually
> test it.

There is no hurry. I just wanted to make sure that the implementation is
moving into the right direction. I'll integrate your review comments and
post v2 when Linux v5.14.0 is actually released. That should make it
easier for testing.

Thanks,
Kurt

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 861 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2021-07-09 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-25  8:10 [PATCH v1 0/6] nptl: Introduce and use FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha
2021-06-25  8:10 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] Linux: Add FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha
2021-07-09 13:32   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-06-25  8:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] nptl: Introduce futex_lock_pi2() Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha
2021-07-09 14:13   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-06-25  8:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] nptl: Use futex_lock_pi2() Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha
2021-07-09 14:21   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-06-25  8:11 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] nptl: Remove mutex test 10 Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha
2021-07-09 14:23   ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-06-25  8:11 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] nptl: mutex-test5: Include CLOCK_MONOTONIC for PI Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha
2021-06-25  8:11 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] nptl: mutex-test9: " Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha
2021-07-09  6:57 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] nptl: Introduce and use FUTEX_LOCK_PI2 Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha
2021-07-09 13:30 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-07-09 14:20   ` Kurt Kanzenbach via Libc-alpha [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878s2f8t6p.fsf@kurt \
    --to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).