From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CFF41F66E for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE1C386183F; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:32:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5BE1C386183F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1597134747; bh=yZvcHWzRJqhkCmWXIB+2ASOAqVS1+o5NhDXk9VSItJs=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=dRw5XlmgqawzuVU/xLfI/MKA5jIjyRZOxgpP/n565/Nz80nL8UaVrU60zsj5ah8yT kMMrUdonukkIIYAYV8s3o5o3m4R2npGQUDUJz7HnZjmkGGPLiOBaKOFX4k/PLXF9lU 7XguYJZ9qdpBxVtD7bvtHgG/TDve85QzsEAnFho0= Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A00A3857C65 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:32:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3A00A3857C65 Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id l2so10644427wrc.7 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:32:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:cc:subject:to:references:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yZvcHWzRJqhkCmWXIB+2ASOAqVS1+o5NhDXk9VSItJs=; b=ZnPD2QV4M9zIvIFTJoybU8BrUFncU/8qJYTFrEARW+sJSsu1Co/Se/X2nW9iyaUVYr ZKgQ+nil4skEgKEQV4bC+3VR3XlDMJc4xwIby1ugj3x67OPZNzD15fPCUapkTDRwwZd8 IhQOSv4LabR39Vct8ONYyHx/NDifL8TDTEFiElEqi0YtSBybv8J9b1EmhnR7oTYjrgLc 4DntKwdp2IjRTwWqk+pC1nLmJd9kjjHQflfHIyVLN88MhTgNvHYTWNlO9uNVszBq1L8U hkcjSiYHzybrZDFTUDFQyq136LaZH9iL6b9w+tDeDm7Z6kV0NF/QcLSR5N7yt//yfVHW WzQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VjqcUwiFmln6zEKH4/DwH+vZdi6cBuTe+vPheFidQtNfJZxsk 4nu6If5nOk2QvOejd/spo1s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAf3DxPK92rZKw7Kpd3TFtm84nYn/JU/wfQOCjCpMrwk2pJGdN0FeS04xRzRwMo/2/lTc/Dw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5588:: with SMTP id i8mr28427711wrv.177.1597134744428; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:a61:241a:1101:8c63:f991:aa91:da82? ([2001:a61:241a:1101:8c63:f991:aa91:da82]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 6sm3996505wmf.4.2020.08.11.01.32.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX To: Larry Dwyer , Michael Kerrisk , austin-group-l@opengroup.org References: <6425d636-7f48-3a73-ef0e-7bb5b991360c@gmail.com> Message-ID: <722119e5-9047-7c47-0d1c-2afeb946d5ca@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:32:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6425d636-7f48-3a73-ef0e-7bb5b991360c@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\) via Libc-alpha" Reply-To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com Cc: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" , Florian Weimer , linux-man , libc-alpha , Andrew Josey , Elliot Hughes , Joseph Myers Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On 8/9/20 1:18 AM, Larry Dwyer via Libc-alpha wrote: > How about the "control" side and the "terminal" side (of the paired > device files)? Thanks for the suggestion. As far as I'm concerned, that would also be an option worth considering. Thanks, Michael