From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F9620248 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:47:42 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Hlz8JXLqajYrKWCl KRsCBoc9fSkIG3pdwiZ0wITUtmBt/WmwEMTRihUPpfXp6md4PxlW5K+AlhyIPVNm aBIJUXw7LU9BI3fEyOvgcy6s8jYakVRfwOYN1uqnICQ0h36LXpmfLe6jK+R/GFVu uTs4Mx4sY67r8Y7xRhtLHKrxwKY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=rEosy+4Va9ustNqcRYCw5Z fLYf8=; b=s6A3cVuk9FPEvpjvOMbR/qY7AXBEqDw4fZK5tBOWPAYBaAKetWc1lg La5WKI3wTT2JJ2R7Owk6CEYb+T6bLetSiSo7raS51ofLxxJW3QyxSSJk4Np7xYCw XPYHCF3mFxEclQr33MLO3Cp55qkvvH6uyJRbmI7My3qbp1DdaeDNM= Received: (qmail 53496 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2019 09:47:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 53485 invoked by uid 89); 4 Mar 2019 09:47:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: shared-ano163.rev.nazwa.pl Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:47:09 +0100 (CET) From: Rafal Luzynski To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Florian Weimer , GNU C Library Message-ID: <56767244.124440.1551692830069@poczta.nazwa.pl> In-Reply-To: References: <87mumqei4h.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <87a7ihv84x.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <14742246.106524.1551401420668@poczta.nazwa.pl> <1577213550.68939.1551428748720@poczta.nazwa.pl> <87va13m1g9.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <1069861979.75290.1551438219460@poczta.nazwa.pl> <683980565.96624.1551486843351@poczta.nazwa.pl> Subject: Re: [PATCH] elf: Add tests with a local IFUNC resolver [BZ #23937] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 2.03.2019 17:54 "H.J. Lu" wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:34 PM Rafal Luzynski > wrote: > > > > 1.03.2019 13:37 "H.J. Lu" wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:57 AM Rafal Luzynski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > 1.03.2019 09:41 Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > What's your binutils version? > > > > > > > > 2.26.1 > > > > > > > > > > Try binutils 2.32. > > > > I've tried binutils-2.32-1.fc31.x86_64 from koji.fedoraproject.org > > and it fails the same, just magic numbers slightly differ. > > > > GCC 6.4.1 and binutils 2.31 branch work for me on x86-64. Still the same failure. I've also checked a similar virtual machine on another physical machine and again the same failure which confirms that it is not anything specific to one CPU model. Does it maybe matter that all my tests are performed in virtual machines controlled by VirtualBox? Regards, Rafal