From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (unknown [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF38B1F9FD for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64ED3950428; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:14:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C64ED3950428 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1615209253; bh=sLXWYUSUrwJ0Kxh1VYvAWVTrivu7oxRLn52xS9fyEhw=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=CO/OvLv8DdOXSM+OnFPbvr24ffIXkfpU2q5HsvmHYuGzGz7JEAlHcGMiHfL3+EG3g 6j1o5MGS7UKJxmPvkporlTmyqVEN71QQ3oz2Fdq/5qZMnDWCUipaYZHZUl6P3omjI/ LJGv47Ju1K05vNOkiXa/HWdCfExHMlxDHThMWz0U= Received: from mail-qv1-xf29.google.com (mail-qv1-xf29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f29]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59170394EC2D for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:14:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 59170394EC2D Received: by mail-qv1-xf29.google.com with SMTP id t1so4512296qvj.8 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:14:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sLXWYUSUrwJ0Kxh1VYvAWVTrivu7oxRLn52xS9fyEhw=; b=pcYQgtOrxPjwk6P5+oM50g3JK5V8VkojjmB9dU48PuvyKOSeQ8VB0vZAPulz0qTpuc u6qJoF0hLSzgmf/3Ay5CIQoWbwTKiMStqpJiuQFEaA4j4hVOmELpScx5vqGlBNey8IJY lzWfPE2iQdwsF6n15ZdiWVFskUfR0KXWHegXepacIfzcNPz6mr9NBkC/bKIKl02ubrCO d8s9yk/zIGqwXGAbjvvbn6vrTmkYEhGirfqSV0JQB9zv3GrLXQsJRza34uCgNUxM76J1 IVPoqLHCxjuoqboSGwMDY9UDVVPzmCYstngRdfKTOGO3hd0B3DC3+n1mTGXKdPsrPq+T Rbhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VVogBtE4IzwAXo3c1CvPX+jsTX5/9dtdx+Pek8yGFmqVfVQE6 /hJAip7LWBvvK5KVJx0r6XFD/GjiXQYbRg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybjiGVohENZTmUmXELX5F6kIYoKOQdbUq5290rC/7i4DWPIGaZ4x4r0qCHW3e56KTg/E2Byw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:f65:: with SMTP id iy5mr21134659qvb.32.1615209248700; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:14:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([177.194.48.209]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g74sm7653093qke.3.2021.03.08.05.14.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 05:14:08 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 47/52] elf: Use LFS and 64 bit time_t for installed programs To: Florian Weimer , Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha References: <20210305201518.798584-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <20210305201518.798584-48-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <87pn0d8h73.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Message-ID: <531445e4-6749-1d10-5591-28b941dc7f19@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:14:06 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pn0d8h73.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Adhemerval Zanella Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On 05/03/2021 17:43, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha: > >> The patch enables for pldd, sprof, ldconfig, and sln. > > Should we do this globally at the Makerules level? Do we have a simple way to accomplish it? _TIME_SIZE and LFS defines should work for 64-bit ABIs, so we have a global rule to enable it I think it would be better indeed.