From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63C961F463 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:54:07 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=vNkMNRpcmAhXn8cO JOexHlCUxeebKaF4OkNQVrY1yijRcJPq0C+LO0TciLwUNQ0E0D2AWd5JuNgAKvrx eIcVkOMvYJ9VYLZORX3VFRiyUH7+P+zyU5yQ+5NCMsu+kph1VA4+xlntpr0wgAiQ l3UnXAH7IO2ivzcprk3DKCLC+dY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=/0tIbe7iMtxxSf7+bI3uh/ bcYE4=; b=wRIzFP5jLCbtrIqZkytG6Wws5VxFEGTjPdQtFQBFolNYgwaS7EGapk DLNVgzUO2EH+49ZvBVAzVJD1cHfwp2VtNZVRLPMbOsn1riDcplQvr34rW1PZejM0 XjxlJJfztEw+d71iyWi0EqOqf8Iwyae0GRQQas+VkTOy1ul3Og4kA= Received: (qmail 8225 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2019 16:54:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8213 invoked by uid 89); 31 Dec 2019 16:54:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mail-pl1-f179.google.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bYYjoBg6wQjGAbtF8jejUZabX2ssZqWLT7NK36gUraM=; b=z1ROZhL9MhZB2k/3HGrTH1BGZCgeQT5v8C8aJI1LTGWQF8Y67udpoewMDfIOBVDVE+ ffXXQiHibhjOfquH1L6G4f0VjYuXGt2uhhQeBPTDmeeFVqFARqrCAZr4SeYfLKH0VbxN mLBUrJXazLDJ4pIluQ85nECkAhbHemlyKwEKnyHEWDdRgFTf2Rq0CgX/oMC6lb7LDUZw DSKPsVMVHri5g1W29XRfTdUpyj4g8OIbpurTaEo1rsPjTOztPVqs3RQXU0RKXzmGK2vA BO4uMyeHSmrbVPqCt09u7RKzB/wRGF2kUpwWDeIQupwocbTNdK2Nk3ATv2gJnmDeYCPe 4How== Subject: Re: 2.31: glibc master is now kinda, sorta, frozen To: Siddhesh Poyarekar , GLIBC Devel Cc: cltang@codesourcery.com, Carlos O'Donell , arjun@redhat.com References: From: Adhemerval Zanella Message-ID: <4f7aabd7-29e9-2dd1-1fca-634b57d2f6a4@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 13:53:57 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 31/12/2019 13:29, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > - vDSO refactor and fixes > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-12/msg00597.html > > Adhemerval, I see some reviews and change requests. Are you waiting for > reviews on the rest of your patches or do you intend to post a v3 > patchset? I can help with reviews on Thursday if nobody gets to it by then. I will check the review already done and send updated versions, thanks for checking on it. > > - Add libm_alias_finite for _finite symbols > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-10/msg00627.html > It moves the _finite symbol to compat symbols and not enable them > for newer architectures. > > Adhemerval, would you be OK with dropping this off the blocker list if a > review suggests that the patchset needs an update? I'll do a review on > Thursday and if there are no changes needed, you can push it in. > However if the patchset needs changes, I'll help with reviews of the > updated patchset too, but you can commit after the 2.31 release. Does > that sound reasonable? I will be around on Thursday and Friday, so if see anything need change we can try to sort this out by Friday and if by then it is not already ready I will postpone to 2.31.