From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Various nscd security fixes
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:53:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <457672cf-5932-4c6a-b31a-387c6f06e984@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1713974801.git.fweimer@redhat.com>
On 4/24/24 12:08, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Carlos filed bug 31677, and it it turns out that this is a reachable
> stack-based buffer overflow. The data looks quite attacker-controlled
> to me and probably can contain NUL bytes with a custom client, so this
> looks quite exploitable to my untrained eye.
>
> Unfortunately, the reproducer kept crashing after the initial patch,
> hence the second and third commit. The two issues fixed in the last
> commit were discovered by reading through the code.
>
> By my count, this needs four different CVE identifiers:
As part of the glibc security team I've reserved and updated bugzilla with 4 CVE IDs.
> Bug 31677: the stack-based buffer overflow (commit 1)
> Bug 31678: two distinct null pointer dereferences (commit 2, commit 3)
> (same flaw type, presumably same version range, so MERGE from a
> CVE perspective)
> Bug 31679: process termination on malloc failure (commit 4)
> Byg 31680: memory corruption due to incorrect callback API assumption
> (commit 4)
>
> Florian Weimer (4):
> nscd: Stack-based buffer overflow in netgroup cache (bug 31677)
> nscd: Do not send missing not-found response in addgetnetgrentX (bug
> 31678)
> nscd: Avoid null pointer crashes after notfound response (bug 31678)
> nscd: netgroup: Use two buffers in addgetnetgrentX (bug 31680)
>
> nscd/netgroupcache.c | 247 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 135 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: f4724843ada64a51d66f65d3199fe431f9d4c254
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] Various nscd security fixes Florian Weimer
2024-04-24 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] nscd: Stack-based buffer overflow in netgroup cache (bug 31677) Florian Weimer
2024-04-24 16:27 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-04-24 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] nscd: Do not send missing not-found response in addgetnetgrentX (bug 31678) Florian Weimer
2024-04-24 16:35 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-04-24 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] nscd: Avoid null pointer crashes after notfound response " Florian Weimer
2024-04-24 16:39 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-04-24 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] nscd: netgroup: Use two buffers in addgetnetgrentX (bug 31680) Florian Weimer
2024-04-24 16:48 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-04-24 20:53 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2024-04-26 0:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] Various nscd security fixes Cristian Rodríguez
2024-04-26 8:10 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=457672cf-5932-4c6a-b31a-387c6f06e984@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).