From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77271F516 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:23:27 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=aUu/7yzZVA+ZwSXA TyqAhuraSdxYnMs8qLy8gbXBf3ugni/bRrUplzfmZKwbRaDeMUq4XP1iQs/Z3JDF SOpncmOKN45oxFBeaofF3g+yyAuY0EBeCbRyeKkbyxlw9vCDFS7zDBGQ6QA63PVr ji2CNXjEGE9yPUvdN1GOxN8ArRo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=nYhzgMYNGgqcAw7B9QMLAi 8maAA=; b=MO4aajGB7cYougfjxEmnFj+5ABYCmDSShwfcpV7PddSZN6uygJ79Pk 1yl42C7bvtNBm9u0mmzRxyYAnwnkvhhi6EYmU1YfqW9bmaau8gUet2Fd0vquGgl3 9Po70dsyUSL6FBxE3/6SmC4q6wklMQ8QYbRGAHRPMFh8tB6JoH+e0= Received: (qmail 122678 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2018 18:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 122602 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jun 2018 18:23:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] New configure option --disable-crypt. To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <20180625134403.2B6DC43994575@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <20180628173335.GA16038@altlinux.org> From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: <4374f7e7-107b-f359-0517-a13480a0da98@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 20:23:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180628173335.GA16038@altlinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 06/28/2018 07:33 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > [...] >> +@item --disable-crypt >> +Do not install the passphrase-hashing library @file{libcrypt} or the >> +header file @file{crypt.h}. @file{unistd.h} will still declare the >> +function @code{crypt}, as required by POSIX@. Using this option does >> +not change the set of programs that may need to be linked with >> +@option{-lcrypt}; it only means that @theglibc{} will not provide that >> +library. > > Given that the first commit of the series moves the declaration of crypt() > from __USE_XOPEN to __USE_MISC, this reference to POSIX becomes less obvious. Well spotted. What about this? @item --disable-crypt Do not install the passphrase-hashing library @file{libcrypt} or the header file @file{crypt.h}. @file{unistd.h} will still declare the function @code{crypt}. Using this option does not change the set of programs that may need to be linked with @option{-lcrypt}; it only means that @theglibc{} will not provide that library. What do you think about the other patches in the series? https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-06/msg00723.html https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-06/msg00724.html https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-06/msg00725.html Do you consider them ready to commit? Thanks, Florian