From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New configure option --disable-crypt.
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 20:23:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4374f7e7-107b-f359-0517-a13480a0da98@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180628173335.GA16038@altlinux.org>
On 06/28/2018 07:33 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> [...]
>> +@item --disable-crypt
>> +Do not install the passphrase-hashing library @file{libcrypt} or the
>> +header file @file{crypt.h}. @file{unistd.h} will still declare the
>> +function @code{crypt}, as required by POSIX@. Using this option does
>> +not change the set of programs that may need to be linked with
>> +@option{-lcrypt}; it only means that @theglibc{} will not provide that
>> +library.
>
> Given that the first commit of the series moves the declaration of crypt()
> from __USE_XOPEN to __USE_MISC, this reference to POSIX becomes less obvious.
Well spotted. What about this?
@item --disable-crypt
Do not install the passphrase-hashing library @file{libcrypt} or the
header file @file{crypt.h}. @file{unistd.h} will still declare the
function @code{crypt}. Using this option does not change the set of
programs that may need to be linked with @option{-lcrypt}; it only
means that @theglibc{} will not provide that library.
What do you think about the other patches in the series?
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-06/msg00723.html
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-06/msg00724.html
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-06/msg00725.html
Do you consider them ready to commit?
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 13:44 [PATCH] New configure option --disable-crypt Florian Weimer
2018-06-25 13:47 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-25 14:20 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-06-25 14:28 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-28 17:33 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2018-06-28 18:23 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2018-06-28 21:20 ` Dmitry V. Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4374f7e7-107b-f359-0517-a13480a0da98@redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).