From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F3931F8C6 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBDA3951815 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:46:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8BBDA3951815 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1627663563; bh=zBilwNh4k7PheatWys6Vsd4jFoK2xC9+Quo7kAxy80g=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=F7ubKGqCs/XsWn+OITczJwgqVDGqF3EZLiKM8yPumNGKN0kGdpANHIi04wYP7g1VI 9pF4Isa/nhkbGxHn/e07wXcKz6XNPxGUYyFRUbIBh+EJ5q1FNXiUOaS/F7gVMVyNvu VKm5gaUO8t9sVwtuLI1D52etNjduhSy9sSreLGm8= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BDE394FC2E for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:43:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 83BDE394FC2E Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-68-9TLB9mZjPqameA08Q779Tg-1; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:43:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9TLB9mZjPqameA08Q779Tg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFFCE1083E81; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.194.62]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D78A5B826; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 16UGhJYd453985 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:43:27 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 16UGhG9f453982; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:43:16 +0200 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:43:15 +0200 To: Joseph Myers Subject: Re: Failures building glibc with mainline GCC Message-ID: <20210730164315.GO2380545@tucnak> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jakub Jelinek via Libc-alpha Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Errors-To: libc-alpha-bounces+e=80x24.org@sourceware.org Sender: "Libc-alpha" On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 04:38:58PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > In addition to failures building glibc, for those configurations for which > glibc builds there's a failure building the testsuite: > > tst-thread_local1.cc:177:5: error: variable 'std::array >, 2> do_thread_X' has initializer but incomplete type > 177 | do_thread_X > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ This is likely a test bug, Jonathan has changed the libstdc++ headers like many times already to include fewer includes for the internal implementation details when the standard doesn't require everything or specific parts from one header to appear whenever including another one. Usually one needs to add new includes when this happens for whatever the test is using. Jakub