Hi Adhemerval,

> On 07/10/2020 11:25, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 07/10/2020 09:52, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:  
> >>
> >>
> >> On 06/10/2020 06:48, Lukasz Majewski wrote:  
> >>> Hi Adhemerval,
> >>>  
> >>>> A new struct __stat{64}_t64 type is added with the required
> >>>> __timespec64 time definition.  Both non-LFS and LFS support were
> >>>> done with an extra __NR_statx call plus a conversion to the new
> >>>> __stat{64}_t64 type.  The statx call is done only for
> >>>> architectures with support for 32-bit time_t ABI.
> >>>>
> >>>> Internally some extra routines to copy from/to struct stat{64}
> >>>> to struct __stat{64} used on multiple implementations (stat,
> >>>> fstat, lstat, and fstatat) are added on a extra file
> >>>> (stat_t64_cp.c).  Aslo some extra routines to copy from statx to
> >>>> __stat{64} is added on statx_cp.c.
> >>>>
> >>>> Checked with a build for all affected ABIs. I also checked on
> >>>> x86_64, i686, powerpc, powerpc64le, sparcv9, sparc64, s390, and
> >>>> s390x.  
> >>>
> >>> When do you plan to pull this patch set to -master?
> >>> Those patches have been available for review on the mailing list
> >>> for more than two months now.  
> >>
> >> Hi Lukasz, thanks to remind me. I will rebase against master and
> >> run some regressions tests against some platforms and push it.
> >>  
> > 
> > One required change with the rebase is adapt the riscv32 ABI to
> > exclude the __{f,l}xstat{at} symbol and replace with proper
> > {f,l}stat ones. It is possible because the new ABI was added on
> > current development branch, however one minor inconvenient is the
> > toolchain need to be rebuild with a updated glibc branch to avoid
> > linking failures with libstd++ (which uses __{f,l}xstat{at}).
> >   
> 
> Ok, I have ran the testsuite on x86_64, x32, i686, aarch64, armhf,
> powerpc, powerpc64, powerpc64le, sparc64, sparcv9, s390x, and s390
> without regression. I will just finish the testing on mips, mips64,
> and alpha since they require some specific implementations.
> 

That would be a huge step forward.

According to list in the following commit message:
https://github.com/lmajewski/y2038_glibc/commit/73215359e184d96b415e87b585a4396b5bd0936c

Then I will send an RFC for enabling support for 64 bit time on
eligible architectures.

Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de