From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BC01F4B5 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 23:07:29 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=wCGI PC7LTmH8qfDuQaqxIeMLhVKygKbNNW/7zxA+ma2D5YMYvvltvE14uZeGRP68AsI1 g9TcOv9r5kTzM54ALZi/uUuTNGvtd1v3bjxJywMFVQDiS+SbCHYfksOjsdNXIgbx Ey2pKg9PDCCvVrF3R0xWu3GMlmJyL/+plvvAPd0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=5rLhwjLynO cAHGcPCtSvY/VgYZA=; b=H5+2mr9EtVO7fVs7PA2stKkujxh1vgiaNi7rPYt312 OY4GdzmBSRmKuw+eNX0L2ta1kg64aqyIPDCNp6yK/WPKXtqPrhMWjzBKEOMGMSxJ hprjIQctmeDrmZAXxXSdKHZvXPCqrsNWR69y/OLIMNaWHvrNguhcKZ1LI/Fvb4wT A= Received: (qmail 90551 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2019 23:07:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 90543 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2019 23:07:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: youngberry.canonical.com Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 00:06:48 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Kees Cook , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds Cc: Aleksa Sarai , Jeff Layton , "J. Bruce Fields" , Arnd Bergmann , David Howells , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Eric Biederman , Andy Lutomirski , Andrew Morton , Alexei Starovoitov , Jann Horn , Tycho Andersen , David Drysdale , Chanho Min , Oleg Nesterov , Rasmus Villemoes , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Christian Brauner , Aleksa Sarai , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/9] open: introduce openat2(2) syscall Message-ID: <20191112230646.47dgr6bbnjv7vkrk@wittgenstein> References: <20191105090553.6350-1-cyphar@cyphar.com> <20191111132404.y523iqicbn6fivx5@yavin.dot.cyphar.com> <201911121457.7D02692@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201911121457.7D02692@keescook> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:01:26PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:24:04AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > > On 2019-11-05, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > > > This patchset is being developed here: > > > > > > > > > Patch changelog: > > > v15: > > > * Fix code style for LOOKUP_IN_ROOT handling in path_init(). [Linus Torvalds] > > > * Split out patches for each individual LOOKUP flag. > > > * Reword commit messages to give more background information about the > > > series, as well as mention the semantics of each flag in more detail. > > > [...] > > > > Ping -- this patch hasn't been touched for a week. Thanks. > > If I've been following correctly, everyone is happy with this series. > (i.e. Linus's comment appear to have been addressed.) > > Perhaps the next question is should this go via a pull request by you to > Linus directly during the v5.5 merge window, via akpm, via akpm, via > Christian, or some other path? Besides Linus, it's not been clear who > should "claim" this series. :) I like this series and the same with the copy_struct_from_user() part of it I've taken I'm happy to stuff this into a dedicated branch, merge it into my for-next and send it for v5.5. Though I'd _much_ rather see Al pick this up or have him give his blessing first. Christian