From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A75C120248 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:22:24 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=WEypR F3+lR3VOS0LBLnmz7ONoHM1GNdqtUgsXQu5Q6UxGLBqu4S+hPP/LkiAAhfcK7F3k N01hVKzDjrrFkUoIRMbDZ2f7cjegyfDopJ8o6xz/iAu063JCR9TTxP7znsHZ6I4c cf4/apHnRrjEiks1Vi5VlACMw5LezLNVB5IfI8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=uwySyq3mgwR U/kplYQ7P1nDT/3Q=; b=oxlraSBmry8rf1K+1dI1ijaIMiZ2fq/uDn53kwcwyfS JNGYwDnL/EtQQg+kV3DI4oBvG7a2UQWAphE/LIPC7HQzqyBAN92+284BOP02FWxH OcYku+6zvlKji0KsSFWEfb3RL9jfx9/NXJKv39MvQTNVy0rTtqO1t+q/Eed3ebUA = Received: (qmail 64447 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2019 09:22:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 64238 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2019 09:22:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mail.linet.jp Message-Id: <201903200921.AA04295@tamuki.linet.gr.jp> From: TAMUKI Shoichi Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:21:51 +0900 To: Rafal Luzynski , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: Felix Yan Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] time: Add tests for Minguo calendar [BZ #24293] In-Reply-To: <116203190.41216.1552952155557@poczta.nazwa.pl> References: <116203190.41216.1552952155557@poczta.nazwa.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello Rafal-san, From: Rafal Luzynski Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] time: Add tests for Minguo calendar [BZ #24293] Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:35:55 +0100 (CET) > > Since cmn_TW.UTF8 and zh_TW.UTF-8 are practically the same, I think > > that the test of only zh_TW.UTF-8 is sufficient. > > My intention was to ensure that the patch works not just for zh_TW > but also for other locales. What is the recommended *_TW which is > sufficiently different from zh_TW? Sorry, you are correct. These *_TW locales are similar to each other, but they are definitely different. Therefore, I have now reconsidered all *_TW locales (except nan_TW@latin) should be checked. > I admit the content of all *_TW locales is the same here. If indeed > all these locales are so similar I don't mind to remove cmn_TW > and leave zh_TW only. The *_TW locales are shown below. Please take care of this order in accordance with ISO 639-[13]. zh_TW Chinese cmn_TW Mandarin Chinese hak_TW Hakka Chinese nan_TW Min Nan Chinese lzh_TW Literary Chinese Since the code for these *_TW locales are exactly same, so we can unify these as follows: | else if (i >= 3 && i <= 7) /* {zh,cmn,hak,nan,lzh}_TW */ | { | [...] | } Regards, TAMUKI Shoichi