From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B58EB1F453 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:01:40 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:from:date:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=K9J/f 4dWr7wnKqPsb2D0y31KIeZZv9VYm9pvk3eJ9gahmcxYPKkauv06SGYC8o+vZndQ2 4FG3CALKRbQjjtwlyGZKxnVJ0USlUQugnKaKXjNJ+joUGHScp541IrIYoKFQHUud dGZB50V20RnIm25FGSrgmB92kV/4q4ZkdSsvpE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:from:date:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=PfTI6QkJBDj 42uZf9iRrKqYHBhU=; b=EKZQK6ox8h27Pw0L/TduWxw4GZEGw7Qiv2ILzgAJw35 QlmuQOlAgyd1/UKsCX+dJOG+1bcgOc4f6i1Fw0HZuNPguA+GcM7fUc66nF6q950Q EbaY2f0MfG36rLxaEyRBxPvlBKvnBei7jUTeKYKK1uNO+9R28/0S7ySvvI5iRSkI = Received: (qmail 121511 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2019 14:01:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 121456 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jan 2019 14:01:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: mail.linet.jp Message-Id: <201901181358.AA04192@tamuki.linet.gr.jp> From: TAMUKI Shoichi Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 22:58:00 +0900 To: Rafal Luzynski , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] strftime: Set the default width of "%Ey" to 2 [BZ #23758] In-Reply-To: <1340798999.404367.1547748713395@poczta.nazwa.pl> References: <1340798999.404367.1547748713395@poczta.nazwa.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello Rafal, From: Rafal Luzynski Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] strftime: Set the default width of "%Ey" to 2 [BZ #23758] Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:11:53 +0100 (CET) > > In Japanese locales, strftime's alternative year format (%Ey) produces > > the year of the current era (Japanese calendar). > > As I wrote in my previous email, the term "Japanese calendar" may be > incorrect here. I think that (Japanese numeric era year) would be more appropriate. > Now I can see that neither of our comments may be correct. "%Ey" produces > the number of the year within the current era. It says which (numbered) > year of the current era is now. Is "nengo" a correct name for this? > Should we maybe drop this parentheses completely, including its content? Not correct, "nengo" (or "gengo") means "era name" (%EC). So, We may rather drop this parentheses completely. > I don't quote the rest of your patch here as it looks correct to me, > looking at previous comments from Zack and Paul. Please rethink this > minor issue in the commit message and/or maybe let's wait for Zack's > or Paul's comment about it and it will be OK for me to commit this. OK, I am going to rethink the minor issue including the quote issue. I will try to match existing sentences as much as possible. Regards, TAMUKI Shoichi