From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Review promise :-)
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:17:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1fce8522-d7c6-dcda-83d4-233ea50f297f@gotplt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06066ce3-8828-34ea-1794-78830acfc65e@gotplt.org>
On 13/02/20 21:14, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On 13/02/20 20:36, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> Correct me if I'm wrong but you were able to migrate the data to Patchwork 2.0?
>>
>> I thought you said you had the ability to migrate the data?
>
> In my last test I got all the way to 1.1 and got stuck there; this as on
> the osci box that Sergio gave me access to. The django migration
> scripts broke at that point and I gave up to do other things.
>
> I'll try to find some time to give it another shot this weekend. I've
> promised to look at the ChangeLog generation slowness too, so patchwork
> goes below that in priority.
I realized I didn't actually answer your question completely: yes the
intent is to migrate all data and at the moment it doesn't look
impossible. The script breakage is not a showstopper IIRC, so we're
still on target to achieving a proper migration with data intact.
Siddhesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-13 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 14:56 Review promise :-) Carlos O'Donell
2020-02-13 15:03 ` Florian Weimer
2020-02-13 15:06 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-02-13 15:44 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2020-02-13 15:47 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2020-02-13 16:01 ` Zack Weinberg
2020-02-13 16:17 ` Florian Weimer
2020-02-13 16:19 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-02-13 17:42 ` Zack Weinberg
2020-02-13 17:57 ` Florian Weimer
2020-02-13 18:12 ` Zack Weinberg
[not found] ` <CAKCAbMi9bejmEgsrQcHau0uwU8Dc42FwFz3Wf6-4Qxyw4WE1hw@mail.gmail.com>
2020-02-13 18:20 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-02-13 18:31 ` Zack Weinberg
2020-02-14 8:43 ` Stefan Liebler
2020-02-14 16:48 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-02-17 7:38 ` Stefan Liebler
2020-02-13 20:54 ` Joseph Myers
2020-02-14 1:12 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1fce8522-d7c6-dcda-83d4-233ea50f297f@gotplt.org \
--to=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).