From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 418151F4B5 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:05:36 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=wNjJ8mm9gqZbLBKh zMD+dosrlpYmGo30bp7NUFBUpWywISILVUcjs+TrmcCGNcn0lH/xzGmycujeacTT jfnBv0eClZIwkFIpKII/kIaZ1HNBJXnhX5xcaGr8w/f8AV9czkaW5WGyeLpl9J2U ky/QnpgQj4LiseJQHynTvW6Bd8g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Hl9Xp3zx/ju/AcOjgc849J mYEmQ=; b=PhjyORHOoQ2cv/uRgCFZqXJZNvVyAnNKFTJmj0EDyC9q1k/+MHdcI/ Aztyr9HuIPVVIfa4JjEJeO6nMv7CiRJXc+vZsKQtKI9l/3lPyHVtJ4CE8Zs0nugR MCi0vGkMxdTBJtLYUN9G7EyzpGRyMYPuv+19syR/EQByP2/2oCm0U= Received: (qmail 97946 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2019 16:05:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 97938 invoked by uid 89); 13 Nov 2019 16:05:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-HELO: us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1573661126; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:openpgp:openpgp:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=IO+brtioDMyIUBqraK5ocRpVeccWjaXyUAuF3SYihgE=; b=aLAEx+d4l+cKAt4b/PQ9umyePMMXKxAnrv1OzQgn1zrtJeqr+A/vray8fuO2y3gUUgl1TX 243oMBxr7g62vxoEOoKPrxxoet4c8xU7DZ9Td8TfjWmiwgt8gMtIe5hTJ0HxvRIrm63mJA FREys1lgWDxQZdF9espxHc76fFNn9Tg= Subject: Re: [review v3] slotinfo in struct dtv_slotinfo_list should be flexible array [BZ #25... To: Florian Weimer , Carlos O'Donell Cc: Sandra Loosemore , Joseph Myers , Florian Weimer , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Szabolcs Nagy , cltang@codesourcery.com, andrew@codesourcery.com References: <20191112114732.2175B20AF6@gnutoolchain-gerrit.osci.io> <4e7ad8ea-43ae-6af6-d2a9-2a05d42b0cc6@codesourcery.com> <87r22dey2c.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <320362b6-854f-230e-5db8-af20f66ef838@redhat.com> <87sgmsbuxn.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> From: Jeff Law Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <1cfea39d-9612-cdf8-50c4-e2e7b32b3c14@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:05:13 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87sgmsbuxn.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/12/19 3:18 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Carlos O'Donell: >=20 >> If the new glibc cannot be compiled with gcc8 or gcc9 for nios2, then th= at's >> a problem though. It immediately makes it difficult to test a new glibc = on >> existing systems without upgrading the system compiler. >=20 > I don't think nios2 systems have system compilers as such =E2=80=A6 Umm, I've been building nios2 glibc with trunk gcc for about 18 months without significant issues. ISTM that if it's broken know it's a recent issue. >=20 >> How long will that take and is it OK to leave things in a broken >> state for that long for a given target like nios2? >=20 > Maybe we should back the fix out and see how quickly we can get in the > other GCC 10 patches? No strong opinion here. I can confirm that things look much better after installing Florian's patches into my tester. THere's instability due to other GCC issues, but Florian's code certainly is a step forward. jeff