From: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add run-time chesk for indirect external access
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 14:45:34 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1cbf0fda-9241-a349-7a34-40043e63351d@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqC0eLX0qWgbi3GgCtm4Wh_pKZVjmNZ0xiBfG-8kQetGw@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/10/2021 14:10, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:58 AM Adhemerval Zanella
> <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/08/2021 18:59, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>> When performing symbol lookup for references in executable without
>>> indirect external access:
>>>
>>> 1. Disallow copy relocations in executable against protected data symbols
>>> in a shared object with indirect external access.
>>> 2. Disallow non-zero symbol values of undefined function symbols in
>>> executable, which are used as the function pointer, against protected
>>> function symbols in a shared object with indirect external access.
>>
>> How hard would to add some testcases for both cases? To simplify we may
>> want to build it iff binutins supports noindirect-extern-access.
>
> I will submit followup patches with testcases from
> users/hjl/indirect/master branch:
>
> https://gitlab.com/x86-glibc/glibc/-/tree/users/hjl/indirect/master
>
> including adding LD_DEBUG=protected to check copy relocations against
> protected data and non-canonical reference to protected function.
>
>> The rest LGTM, just a nit below due an ununsed variable.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
>>
>>> ---
>>> elf/dl-lookup.c | 5 ++++
>>> sysdeps/generic/dl-protected.h | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 sysdeps/generic/dl-protected.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/elf/dl-lookup.c b/elf/dl-lookup.c
>>> index eea217eb28..430359af39 100644
>>> --- a/elf/dl-lookup.c
>>> +++ b/elf/dl-lookup.c
>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>>> #include <ldsodefs.h>
>>> #include <dl-hash.h>
>>> #include <dl-machine.h>
>>> +#include <dl-protected.h>
>>> #include <sysdep-cancel.h>
>>> #include <libc-lock.h>
>>> #include <tls.h>
>>> @@ -527,6 +528,10 @@ do_lookup_x (const char *undef_name, uint_fast32_t new_hash,
>>> if (__glibc_unlikely (dl_symbol_visibility_binds_local_p (sym)))
>>> goto skip;
>>>
>>> + if (ELFW(ST_VISIBILITY) (sym->st_other) == STV_PROTECTED)
>>> + _dl_check_protected_symbol (undef_name, undef_map, ref, map,
>>> + type_class);
>>> +
>>> switch (ELFW(ST_BIND) (sym->st_info))
>>> {
>>> case STB_WEAK:
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>>> diff --git a/sysdeps/generic/dl-protected.h b/sysdeps/generic/dl-protected.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..244d020dc4
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/sysdeps/generic/dl-protected.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
>>> +/* Support for STV_PROTECTED visibility. Generic version.
>>> + Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>> + This file is part of the GNU C Library.
>>> +
>>> + The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>>> + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
>>> + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
>>> + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>>> +
>>> + The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>>> + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>>> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
>>> + Lesser General Public License for more details.
>>> +
>>> + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
>>> + License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
>>> + <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef _DL_PROTECTED_H
>>> +#define _DL_PROTECTED_H
>>> +
>>> +static inline void __attribute__ ((always_inline))
>>> +_dl_check_protected_symbol (const char *undef_name,
>>
>> This argument seems unused.
>
> It is used in
>
> _dl_signal_error (0, map->l_name, undef_name,
> N_("non-canonical reference to canonical
> protected function"));
Indeed, you are right.
>
>>> + const struct link_map *undef_map,
>>> + const ElfW(Sym) *ref,
>>> + const struct link_map *map,
>>> + int type_class)
>>> +{
>>> + if (undef_map != NULL
>>> + && undef_map->l_type == lt_executable
>>> + && !(undef_map->l_1_needed
>>> + & GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED_INDIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS)
>>> + && (map->l_1_needed
>>> + & GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED_INDIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS))
>>> + {
>>> + if ((type_class & ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_COPY))
>>> + /* Disallow copy relocations in executable against protected
>>> + data symbols in a shared object which needs indirect external
>>> + access. */
>>> + _dl_signal_error (0, map->l_name, undef_name,
>>> + N_("copy relocation against non-copyable protected symbol"));
>>> + else if (ref->st_value != 0
>>> + && ref->st_shndx == SHN_UNDEF
>>> + && (type_class & ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_PLT))
>>> + /* Disallow non-zero symbol values of undefined symbols in
>>> + executable, which are used as the function pointer, against
>>> + protected function symbols in a shared object with indirect
>>> + external access. */
>>> + _dl_signal_error (0, map->l_name, undef_name,
>>> + N_("non-canonical reference to canonical protected function"));
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +#endif /* _DL_PROTECTED_H */
>>>
>>
>> Ok.
>
> I will check it in ASIS.
>
> Thanks.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-07 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-03 21:59 [PATCH 1/2] Initial support for GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-08-03 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] Add run-time chesk for indirect external access H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-09-27 2:10 ` PING^1 " H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-10-07 16:58 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-10-07 17:10 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-10-07 17:45 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha [this message]
2021-10-07 14:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] Initial support for GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-10-07 15:11 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
2021-10-07 16:53 ` Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
2021-10-07 17:04 ` H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1cbf0fda-9241-a349-7a34-40043e63351d@linaro.org \
--to=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).