From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Simon Chopin <simon.chopin@canonical.com>,
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Subject: Monday Patch Queue Review update (2024-03-25)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:54:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16d5bcf7-ae32-4f10-b787-b5bf826b95a1@redhat.com> (raw)
Most recent meeting status is always here:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/PatchworkReviewMeetings#Update
Meeting: 2024-03-25 @ 0900h EST5EDT
Video/Audio: https://bbb.linuxfoundation.org/room/adm-alk-1uu-7fu
IRC: #glibc on OFTC.
Review new patches and restart review at the top.
* State NEW delegate NOBODY at 405 patches.
* Carlos's SLI at 290 days average patch age in queue and 119946 accumulated patch days.
* Starting at 87613
* manual: Drop incorrect statement on PIPE_BUF and blocking writes (Stepan)
* Changes requested.
* aarch64-gnu port & GNU/Hurd on AArch64 progress (Sergey)
* Szabolcs: I looked at it some months ago. It fortunately touches very little in core aarch64 code.
* Carlos: Marked FAILED CI.
* Math static build fixes (Adhemerval)
* Adhemerval: --disable-shared is broken, but checking for a static build is broken for a long time.
* HJ: Does the test expose all the issues?
* Adhemerval: It does. I hooked into the type framework to enable the static cases. The enablement is not full coverage.
* x86_64: Remove avx512 strstr implementation (Adhemerval)
* Has RB from Noah Goldstein.
* tests: handle AppArmor userns mitigation (Simon)
* Changes requested.
* [1/4] or1k: Fix Linux user space signal ABI (Stafford Horne)
* Rejected. Should be handled as part of the new hard float ABI bringup.
* Improve wcsstr (Adhemerval)
* Review pool: Assigned to DJ based on previous review.
* [1/2] Add random benchmark (Wilco)
* Review pool: Adhemerval.
* Benchtests: Improve large memcpy/memset benchmarks (Wilco)
* Review pool: Carlos.
* Benchtests: Remove broken walk benchmarks
* Review pool: Carlos.
* manual/math.texi: logb(3) and cbrt(3) fixes (Alejandro)
* Review pool: DJ.
* Extend rseq support (Michael)
* DJ reviewed initial posting and was requesting a secondary review for ABI.
* Carlos: Michael needs to repost a rebased version.
* Stopping at 83697.
* Discussed blockers and looked at monthly planning.
* Carlos: I didn't get to finish the pthread cancel review.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
reply other threads:[~2024-03-25 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/involved.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16d5bcf7-ae32-4f10-b787-b5bf826b95a1@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.chopin@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).